Search Results for "delay penalty"

1531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Withholding of Pension and Gratuity During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings. State of Bihar's Circulars and Resolution Cannot Override Rule 43(b) of Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 Which Requires a Finding of Guilt Before Withholding Pension.

The appellant, Dr. Hira Lal, was a Touring Veterinary Officer in Bihar who was implicated in the Fodder Scam (RC Case No.48 A/1996) and placed under s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation of Delhi's Petition Seeking Mandamus Against State of Maharashtra to Execute Distress Warrants. Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Has No Extra-Territorial Application, Hence No Duty on Maharashtra Authorities.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), a statutory body under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, filed a writ petition in the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — No Ground to Set Aside Sale After Certificate Issued and No Appeal Filed.

The petitioners, Si2 Microsystems Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sanjay Vedaprakash Soni, availed a cash credit facility of Rs. 10 crores and a term loan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Consider Reward to Informer's Widow Under Circular 20/2015 — Withholding of Reward Unjustified. The court held that the reward policy must be applied and the widow's representation must be considered within eight weeks.

The petitioner, Jayashree Chandrakant Dhavre, is the widow of a deceased informer who provided specific information to the Marine and Preventive Wing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Demand Notices for Lack of Proper Adjudication and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' Input Tax Credit Reversal and Refund Claims Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Opportunity of Hearing.

The Bombay High Court disposed of three writ petitions filed by Rochem India Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Construction Company Limited, and JSB Dream Homes Pv...