Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

3139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.

The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Limitation Dispute Between Contractor and Municipal Corporation. Court holds that cause of action for arbitration arose on rejection of claim by Commissioner on 6th January 2000, not on earlier dates, and thus reference was within limitation.

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. R.N. Ghanekar & Co. (Appellant) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Respondent) against a com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Teacher's Challenge to Termination by Private School Under MEPS Act. The Court Upheld the Authenticity of the Appointment Order and Analyzed the Legal Nature of Fixed-Term Appointments Under Section 5(2) of the Act.

The case before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, arose from a writ petition filed by a teacher against the judgment of the School Tribunal that ha...