Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC). They filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the termination of their services by the respondents, which included the PCMC, its Municipal Commissioner, the Medical Officer of Health, and the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners contended that their services were terminated arbitrarily without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, thereby violating the principles of natural justice and their fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The respondents argued that the petitioners were contractual employees and their services could be terminated at any time without assigning any reason. The court, after hearing the submissions, held that even contractual employees have a right to livelihood under Article 21 and cannot be terminated arbitrarily. The court found that the termination was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice as no notice or opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners. The court set aside the termination and directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue in service. The court also made the rule absolute and disposed of the petition accordingly.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Livelihood - Article 21 - Termination of Contractual Safai Kamacharis - The petitioners were engaged as safai kamacharis on contract basis by the Municipal Corporation. Their services were terminated without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The Court held that even contractual employees have a right to livelihood under Article 21 and cannot be terminated arbitrarily without following principles of natural justice. The termination was set aside and the petitioners were allowed to continue. (Paras 1-10)

B) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Termination of Services - The Court held that the termination of services of the petitioners without any notice or opportunity of hearing was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Municipal Corporation acted arbitrarily and the termination was quashed. (Paras 5-10)

C) Service Law - Contractual Employment - Termination - The petitioners were working as safai kamacharis on contract basis. The Court held that the termination of their services without any reason or notice was illegal and directed the respondents to allow them to continue in service. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of the petitioners, who were working as safai kamacharis on contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, without giving them any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, is arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the termination of the petitioners' services, and directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue in service. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • right to livelihood
  • Article 14
  • Article 21
  • contractual employment
  • termination without notice
  • public employment
  • safai kamacharis
  • municipal corporation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (12) 81

Writ Petition No. 262 of 2015

2015-12-03

N.M. Jamdar

Mr. V.P. Vaidya with Neel Helekar for the Petitioners, Mr. K.S. Bapat with G.H. Keluskar for Respondents 1 to 3, Mr. A.D. Kango, AGP for Respondent 4

Sandip Baliram Sandbhor and 18 others

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and 3 others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging termination of services of safai kamacharis.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the termination of their services and a direction to allow them to continue as safai kamacharis.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' services were terminated without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, which they alleged was arbitrary and violative of natural justice and fundamental rights.

Issues

Whether the termination of services of the petitioners without notice or opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. Whether contractual employees have a right to livelihood under Article 21 and cannot be terminated arbitrarily.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that their termination was arbitrary and without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice and Articles 14 and 21. Respondents argued that the petitioners were contractual employees and their services could be terminated at any time without assigning any reason.

Ratio Decidendi

Even contractual employees have a right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and termination of their services without prior notice or opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Article 14.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. Taken up for disposal. The petitioners were working as safai kamacharis on contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation. Their services were terminated without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The termination is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The petitioners have a right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution. The termination is set aside and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioners to continue in service.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 262 of 2015 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the termination of their services. The court issued rule and heard the matter. The respondents waived service and the petition was taken up for final disposal.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 21, Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Medical Practitioner Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Due to Exemption Under Schedule K of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. Registered Medical Practitioner Found with Small Quantity of Medicines f...