Search Results for "Government Consideration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Government Consideration"

16479 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16479 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Illegal Removal, Holding that Past Record Consideration for Lesser Penalty Does Not Require Fresh Show Cause Notice. Omission to Mention Past Record in Show Cause Notice Not Fatal When Record is Used to Mitigate Punishment, Not Aggravate It, and When Notice of Record Was Otherwise Given.

17 Jan 1969

The respondent, Harish Chandra Singh, was a Sub-Inspector of Police in Uttar Pradesh who was removed from service following disciplinary proceedings u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.

11 May 2012

The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal to Convert Agricultural Land to Residential Zone Under MRTP Act. The court held that the State Government's decision under Section 20 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 was a policy matter and not arbitrary, thus not liable to be interfered with under Article 226.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a businessman engaged in real estate development in Pune, claimed ownership of lands in Kesnand, Wadebolhai, and Siraswadi villages an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Deplorable Road Conditions and Pothole Deaths in Mumbai. Court Holds Right to Well-Maintained Roads as Fundamental Right Under Article 21 and Issues Mandatory Directions to Authorities.

13 Oct 2025

This suo motu public interest litigation was registered by the Bombay High Court in 2013 based on a letter from Justice G.S. Patel highlighting the pa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards for Reservation in Promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Under Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution. The Court Held That There Is No Fixed Yardstick for Quantifiable Data Showing Inadequacy of Representation, and the State Must Collect Data Based on Cadre as the Unit, with Sampling Methods Permissible, While Affirming the Prospective Operation of M. Nagaraj v. Union of India.

28 Jan 2022

The judgment arose from a batch of cases challenging reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 16(4-A) of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Directors of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Under Section 8 of Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 — No Prior Hearing Required for Removal in Public Interest. The court held that the power of removal under Section 8 is a statutory power exercised in public interest and does not require a prior hearing or recording of reasons.

8 May 2015

The petitioners were Directors of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), a corporation established under the Road Transport Corpora...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Premature Release for Life Convict in Murder and Rape Case — Mandamus Issued to Place Case Before Life Convicts Premature Release Committee. Petitioner, convicted under Sections 201, 302 and 376 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, sought direction for premature release consideration; court held that the petitioner has a right to have his case considered by the Committee.

2 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Sri Omkarmurthy, a life convict serving sentence in Central Prison, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

98 99 100 101 102

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)