High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Premature Release for Life Convict in Murder and Rape Case — Mandamus Issued to Place Case Before Life Convicts Premature Release Committee. Petitioner, convicted under Sections 201, 302 and 376 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, sought direction for premature release consideration; court held that the petitioner has a right to have his case considered by the Committee.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Omkarmurthy, a life convict serving sentence in Central Prison, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction by issuance of a writ of mandamus to the respondents, including the State of Karnataka, the Life Convicts Release Committee, the Director General of Police (Prisons and Correctional Services), and the Chief Superintendent of Central Prison, to place his case before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee for consideration of premature release. The petitioner was convicted in S.C.No.52/2008 for offences punishable under Sections 201, 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. He had been in custody since 23.11.2007 and was convicted on 12.10.2010. He filed a criminal appeal before the High Court in Crl.A.No.184/2020, wherein he was acquitted. The court heard the petitioner's counsel, Sri K.B. Monesh Kumar, and the Additional Government Advocate, Sri B.V. Krishna. The court noted the facts and directed the respondents to place the petitioner's case before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The Committee was directed to consider the case on its merits and pass appropriate orders within a further period of six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Premature Release of Life Convict - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner, convicted under Sections 201, 302 and 376 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, sought direction to respondents to place his case before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee - Court held that the petitioner has a right to have his case considered by the Committee and directed the respondents to do so within a specified time - Held that the Committee must consider the case on its merits and pass appropriate orders (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a life convict, is entitled to a direction to the respondents to place his case before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee for consideration of premature release.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed respondents 1, 3 and 4 to place the petitioner's case before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The Committee was directed to consider the case on its merits and pass appropriate orders within a further period of six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Mandamus
  • Premature release
  • Life convict
  • Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Consideration of case by committee
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (03) 39

Writ Petition No. 1300 of 2023 (GM-RES)

2023-03-02

M. Nagaprasanna

Sri K.B. Monesh Kumar, Sri Pradeep Patil, Sri B.V. Krishna

Sri Omkarmurthy

State of Karnataka, The Life Convicts Release Committee, The Director General of Police Prisons and Correctional Services, Chief Superintendent of Central Prison

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for consideration of premature release of a life convict.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to place petitioner's case before Life Convicts Premature Release Committee.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a life convict, sought premature release consideration.

Previous Decisions

Petitioner was convicted in S.C.No.52/2008 on 12.10.2010 for offences under Sections 201, 302 and 376 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed Crl.A.No.184/2020 in which he was acquitted.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to the respondents to place his case before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee for consideration of premature release.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued for direction to place case before Committee. Respondents' counsel opposed or submitted to court's order.

Ratio Decidendi

A life convict has a right to have his case considered for premature release by the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee, and the court can issue a writ of mandamus to ensure such consideration.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents 1, 3 and 4 to place the case of the petitioner before the Life Convicts Premature Release Committee. The petitioner gets embroiled in a crime which ends up in his conviction in S.C.No.52/2008. The petitioner files a criminal appeal before this Court in Crl.A.No.184/2020, wherein, this Court acquitted the petitioner.

Procedural History

Petitioner was arrested on 23.11.2007, convicted on 12.10.2010 in S.C.No.52/2008, filed Crl.A.No.184/2020 in which he was acquitted, then filed this writ petition on an unspecified date.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 201, 302, 376
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Premature Release for Life Convict in Murder and Rape Case — Mandamus Issued to Place Case Before Life Convicts Premature Release Committee. Petitioner, convicted under Sections 201, 302 and 376 IPC ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Sentencing of Husband for Default in Payment of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC — Imprisonment for Non-Payment of Arrears of Rs.16,250 Upheld as Legal and Proportionate. The court held that the Magistrate had jurisdicti...