Search Results for "arbitrary restriction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrary restriction"

898 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 898 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging National Film Awards Regulations — Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) Requiring Film Format Release and CBFC Certification Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14 and Not Violative of Article 19(1)(a). The court held that the eligibility criteria for awards do not infringe freedom of speech and are rationally connected to the objective of promoting film art.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioners, Gaurav Ashwin Jani, Anand Patwardhan, and Simantini Dhuruv, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging Regulations 10...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MAT Order Directing Age Relaxation for Dental Surgeons Under Maharashtra Recruitment Rules. Contractual Service Status Under National Health Mission and Applicability of Rule 3(b) of the Directorate of Health Service Recruitment Rules, 1990 Are Core Issues.

9 Jul 2026

The matter arose from a recruitment process for 189 Dental Surgeon posts initiated by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) in 2015. The or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2024

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Material Particulars in Show Cause Notices under Bombay Police Act, 1951. Show cause notices must contain date, month, time and place of alleged incidents; externment orders cannot rely on extraneous material not mentioned in the notice.

22 Sep 2005

The Bombay High Court decided three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The petitioners we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MCGM's Condition Requiring No Objection Certificate from Indian Navy for Occupancy Certificate and Development Permission. Petitioners Argue That Imposition of Such Condition is Arbitrary and Without Statutory Sanction.

21 Jun 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In Writ Petition No. 229 of 2018, M/s S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's Open Access Regulations in Challenge by Industrial Consumers. The Court held that the RERC has jurisdiction to regulate both intra-state and inter-state open access, and the restrictions imposed are reasonable and within the statutory framework of the Electricity Act, 2003.

1 Apr 2025

The present appeals challenge two separate orders of the Rajasthan High Court upholding the validity of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)