Search Results for "outstanding payments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "outstanding payments"

812 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 812 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

14 Jan 2020

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

28 Jun 2021

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets and Not Disputed, Constituting Admission of Liability Under Section 433(e) and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

2 Apr 2018

The judgment arises from four appeals filed by M/s. RojeeTasha Stampings Private Ltd., M/s. Automotive Metal Stampings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ganage Pressing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit in Hire Purchase Agreement Case — Plaintiff Entitled to Outstanding Instalments and Damages. Breach of Contract by Defendant No.1 and Guarantor Liability of Defendant No.2 Established Under Hire Purchase Agreement.

6 Jul 2005

The plaintiff, Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 72,311/- with interest on the principal amount of Rs. 63,677/-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Outstanding Payment for Goods Supplied — Confirmation of Debt and Part Payment Establishes Liability. The court held that a summary suit for recovery of debt is maintainable even on a running account when the debtor has confirmed the debt and made part payments, and the suit is within limitation.

15 Sep 2011

The plaintiff, The Paper Products Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, M/s. Venkataramana Food Specialties Ltd., for recovery of Rs. 16,0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs BEST Undertaking to Pay 30% of Retiral Dues to Ex-Employees, Recognizing Their Absolute Entitlement. Non-Payment Due to Financial Constraints of BEST Undertaking and Over-Dependence on MCGM and State Government Held Unacceptable.

30 Jun 2026

This batch of writ petitions was filed by ex-employees of the Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) seeking payment of unpa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Lease Allotments for Alleged Non-Payment of Delayed Payment Charges. The Court Considered Whether Acceptance of Delayed Payments Without Protest Constituted Waiver of Delayed Payment Charges and Whether Cancellation of Allotments Was Justified.

28 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the cancellation of lease allotments by CIDCO for allegedly...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition in Company Dispute Over Back-to-Back Payment Clause. Payment Obligation Conditioned on Receipt from HAL, Not Absolute Debt, Hence Bona Fide Dispute Exists.

17 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Tata Advanced Materials Ltd., filed a company petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Dispute Over Principal Amount and Interest Rate Constitutes Triable Issues Under Order XXXVII CPC.

19 Jan 2024

The Plaintiff, Oriental Aromatics Limited, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the Defendant, Poonam...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)