Bombay High Court Directs BEST Undertaking to Pay 30% of Retiral Dues to Ex-Employees, Recognizing Their Absolute Entitlement. Non-Payment Due to Financial Constraints of BEST Undertaking and Over-Dependence on MCGM and State Government Held Unacceptable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This batch of writ petitions was filed by ex-employees of the Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) seeking payment of unpaid gratuity, pension, and other retiral dues upon superannuation. The petitioners had rendered long years of service and were absolutely entitled to these amounts as a matter of right. The BEST Undertaking failed to make payment, citing severe financial constraints and an over-dependence on the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and the State Government for financial support. The court noted that both BEST and MCGM are statutory bodies under the Mumbai Municipal Corporations Act, 1888, and must act as model employers. It held that non-payment of retiral dues was unacceptable. On 10th May 2024, a Division Bench directed BEST to calculate and pay 30% of the total retiral dues to each retired employee and reserved the right to issue further directions regarding the balance based on the undertaking's conduct. The present oral judgment, dated 30th June 2026, is a continuation of these proceedings, and the court reaffirmed the obligation of the undertaking to meet its commitments, emphasizing the absolute nature of the employees' entitlement.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Retiral Benefits - Entitlement to Gratuity and Pension - Mumbai Municipal Corporations Act, 1888 (General Obligations) - The court directed BEST Undertaking to pay 30% of retiral dues, recognizing that such dues are an absolute entitlement; held that despite financial constraints, the statutory body must act as a model employer and discharge its obligations; further directions on balance payment reserved based on conduct (Paras 1, 2, 12-13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether ex-employees of BEST Undertaking are entitled to immediate payment of gratuity, pension, and other retiral dues upon superannuation, and what directions should be issued despite the financial constraints of the undertaking

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the Respondent-BEST Undertaking to calculate and pay 30% of the retiral/terminal dues to each retired employee, and reserved further directions on the balance amount based on the undertaking's conduct.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • Retiral dues are absolute entitlement of employees
  • Statutory bodies must act as model employers
  • Obligation of BEST Undertaking and MCGM to pay under Mumbai Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1888
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 2

Writ Petition No. 913 of 2024 and connected matters

2026-06-30

G. S. Kulkarni, Aarti Sathe

Citation not available, 2026:BHC-OS:14799-DB

Ms. Gayatri Singh, Sr. Adv. i/b R. D. Bhatt, Ms. Priya Chaubey i/b Ms. Sapna Rachure, Ms. Lubdha Bhoir a/w Ms. Gargi Gupta, Mr. Vinit Dhotre, Ms. Gayatri Nayak h/f Rajesh Khobragade, Kranti L. C. i/b Kaustubh Gidh, Mr. Amar Mishra, AGP, Ms. Usha Rahi, AGP, Ms. Sheetal Malvankar, AGP, Ms. Vrushali Kabre, AGP, Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Sr. Adv. a/w Ms. Pushpa Yadav, Ms. Bharati Lohakare, Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Ashish Venugopal, Mr. Sagar Shetty, Ms. Meghna Vijan, Ms. Shubhra Swami i/b Sagar Shetty, Ms. Heena Shaikh i/b M. V. Kini & Co.

Ajay Vasantrao Naik and Others

The State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking payment of gratuity, pension, and other retiral dues upon superannuation

Remedy Sought

Payment of unpaid gratuity, pension, and other retiral dues

Filing Reason

Non-payment of retiral dues after superannuation despite absolute entitlement

Previous Decisions

On 10th May 2024, a Division Bench directed BEST Undertaking to pay 30% of the retiral dues of each retired employee and reserved the right to extend time or issue a one-time direction based on the undertaking's conduct

Issues

Whether ex-employees are entitled to immediate payment of retiral dues despite financial constraints of the employer, and what directions should be issued to secure such payment

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that gratuity, pension, and other retiral dues are an absolute entitlement upon superannuation after long service Respondents cited lack of financial resources with BEST Undertaking and over-dependence on MCGM and State Government as reasons for non-payment

Ratio Decidendi

Retiral dues of employees are an absolute entitlement; statutory bodies like BEST Undertaking must act as model employers and cannot shirk their obligation to pay such dues on the ground of financial constraints; the Mumbai Municipal Corporations Act, 1888 imposes a duty on the undertaking and the MCGM to ensure payment.

Judgment Excerpts

the reason for non payment of such amounts was nothing but lack of financial resources with the BEST Undertaking, and the over dependence of the BEST Undertaking for such financial requirements, not only in relation to its regular business in relation to transport and generation of electricity,s but also even to pay its employees on the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (“ MCGM ”) and the State Government. Both the authorities in question are statutory bodies and should act as model employers. the Respondent-BEST Undertaking will pay 30% of the retiral dues of each of the retired employees

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed by ex-employees of BEST Undertaking seeking payment of retiral dues. On 10th May 2024, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court passed an order directing payment of 30% of the dues and reserving further directions. The present oral judgment dated 30th June 2026 is a continuation of those proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporations Act, 1888:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs BEST Undertaking to Pay 30% of Retiral Dues to Ex-Employees, Recognizing Their Absolute Entitlement. Non-Payment Due to Financial Constraints of BEST Undertaking and Over-Dependence on MCGM and State Government Held Unaccept...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurer's Appeal in Crop Insurance Dispute — State Government Directed to Reassess Claims and Pay Compensation to Farmers. The Division Bench set aside the Single Judge's order directing compensation and reframing of ...