Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Outstanding Payment for Goods Supplied — Confirmation of Debt and Part Payment Establishes Liability. The court held that a summary suit for recovery of debt is maintainable even on a running account when the debtor has confirmed the debt and made part payments, and the suit is within limitation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, The Paper Products Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, M/s. Venkataramana Food Specialties Ltd., for recovery of Rs. 16,08,530/- being the outstanding amount for packaging materials supplied. The plaintiff had supplied goods as per purchase orders from 10 October 2006 to 23 August 2007. The total amount due was Rs. 29,40,232.11, out of which the defendant paid Rs. 18,16,831/- by eight cheques, leaving a balance of Rs. 11,23,401/-. The plaintiff added interest at 24% per annum, making the total claim Rs. 16,08,530/-. The defendant confirmed the outstanding amount of Rs. 19,85,040.44 as on 31 December 2007 by a letter. Despite a legal notice dated 9 April 2009, the defendant failed to pay. The plaintiff obtained leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent on 10 November 2009 and filed the suit on 10 December 2009. The defendant entered appearance on 3 March 2010. The plaintiff took out a Summons for Judgment on 20 April 2010. The defendant filed a reply on 24 March 2011, and the plaintiff filed a rejoinder on 29 March 2011. The court considered whether the suit was maintainable and whether the defendant had a triable defence. The court held that the suit was maintainable as the defendant had confirmed the debt and made part payments, and the suit was within limitation. The court rejected the defendant's defence regarding calculation of arrears of Rs. 35,999.89 as not credible. The court allowed the Summons for Judgment and passed a decree in favour of the plaintiff for the claimed amount with interest.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Suit - Maintainability - Order 37 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Summary suit for recovery of outstanding payment for goods supplied is maintainable even if based on running account, especially when the defendant has confirmed the debt and made part payments - The court held that the suit is maintainable and within limitation (Paras 6-7).

B) Limitation - Running Account - Confirmation of Debt - Limitation Act, 1963, Article 14 - Suit based on running account is within limitation when the last payment or confirmation of debt is within three years of filing - The court held that the suit is within limitation (Para 6).

C) Evidence - Confirmation of Debt - Acknowledgment of Liability - Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17 - Confirmation letter dated 31 December 2007 acknowledging the outstanding amount of Rs. 19,85,040.44 constitutes an acknowledgment of liability - The court held that the confirmation letter supports the plaintiff's claim (Para 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a summary suit for recovery of outstanding payment for goods supplied is maintainable when the defendant has made part payments and confirmed the debt, and whether the defence raised by the defendant is sufficient to grant leave to defend.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Summons for Judgment is allowed. The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff the sum of Rs. 16,08,530/- with interest at 24% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until payment. The suit is decreed accordingly.

Law Points

  • Summary suit maintainable for recovery of debt based on running account
  • confirmation of debt by debtor
  • part payment acknowledgment
  • limitation period for suit on running account
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (09) 81

Summons for Judgment No. 163 of 2010 in Summary Suit No. 245 of 2010

2011-09-15

Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Mr. K.R. Belosay for the Plaintiffs, Mr. R.A. Shaikh for the Defendants

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Summary suit for recovery of outstanding payment for goods supplied.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks decree for Rs. 16,08,530/- with interest and costs.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to make full payment for packaging materials supplied despite confirmation of debt and legal notice.

Previous Decisions

Leave under Clause XII of Letters Patent granted on 10 November 2009.

Issues

Whether the summary suit is maintainable based on a running account? Whether the defendant has a triable defence to grant leave to defend?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff: The suit is maintainable as the defendant confirmed the debt and made part payments; the suit is within limitation. Defendant: The suit is based on a running account and is not maintainable; there is a dispute regarding calculation of arrears of Rs. 35,999.89.

Ratio Decidendi

A summary suit for recovery of debt is maintainable even if based on a running account, especially when the defendant has confirmed the debt and made part payments. The confirmation letter constitutes an acknowledgment of liability, and the suit is within limitation. The defence raised by the defendant is not credible and does not entitle the defendant to leave to defend.

Judgment Excerpts

The Plaintiffs have filed the Summary Suit on 30 October 2009 to recover the sum of Rs. 16,08,530/ as the Defendants failed to make the full payment of goods supplied (Packaging materials) as per the purchase orders from time to time though the Defendants received and accepted the goods and there was no dispute as to the quality and quantity. By letter dated 31 December 2007 the Defendants have confirmed the amount of Rs. 19,85,040.44 as on 31 December 2007. The Suit, therefore, as filed is maintainable in this Court and is within limitation.

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed Summary Suit on 30 October 2009. Leave under Clause XII of Letters Patent granted on 10 November 2009. Suit lodged on 10 December 2009. Defendant entered appearance on 3 March 2010. Plaintiff took out Summons for Judgment on 20 April 2010. Defendant filed reply on 24 March 2011. Plaintiff filed rejoinder on 29 March 2011. Matter heard and judgment reserved on 25 August 2011, pronounced on 15 September 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 37
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Article 14
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Section 17
  • Letters Patent: Clause XII
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Outstanding Payment for Goods Supplied — Confirmation of Debt and Part Payment Establishes Liability. The court held that a summary suit for recovery of debt is maintainable even on a runnin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging De-registration of Housing Federation in Ongoing Real Estate Project — RERA Rule 9(1)(ii) Overrides MCS Act for Formation of Apex Body Before Project Completion.