WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022
2 May 2025The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
Search Results for "fait accompli"
73 result(s) found
Found 73 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Confirmation of Attachment Order Under KPIDFE Act — Financial Establishment's Failure to Repay Depositors Justifies Absolute Attachment. The Court upheld the trial court's order confirming the interim attachment of properties of M/s. Lancer Finance under Section 5(2) of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004, finding no illegality or perversity in the decision.
20 Dec 2024The case involves an appeal filed under Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (KPIDFE...
- 193
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.
3 Apr 2024The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Revival of Defunct Tree Authorities in Goa Under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 — Failure to Conduct Tree Census for 37 Years Constitutes Dereliction of Statutory Duty. The court issued a writ of mandamus to ensure the Tree Authorities commence functioning, conduct a tree census, co-opt experts, and publish information under Section 4 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
8 Jul 2021The petitioner, Living Heritage Foundation, an NGO, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa complaining that the Tree A...
- 17
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Appoints Independent Arbitrator in Perkins Eastman v. HSCC Dispute — Clause 24 Arbitration Mechanism Invalid Due to Lack of Impartiality. The Court held that a person ineligible to act as arbitrator cannot appoint an arbitrator, relying on TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Limited.
29 Nov 2019The Supreme Court considered an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the App...
- 313
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review is not an appeal in disguise and that the judgment under review did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record.
18 Dec 2018The applicants, who were the original respondents in the main petition, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedur...
- 30
High Court
High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Contract Dated 27.09.2013.
8 Dec 2017The petitioner, Sobha Projects and Trade Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Respondent Held Invalid; Former High Court Judge Appointed as Sole Arbitrator.
8 Dec 2017The petitioner, M/s. Eagle – MPCC (J.V.), a joint venture company, entered into a contract with the respondent, South Western Railway, on 08/03/2011...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Section 11 Petition After Nine-Year Delay. Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed in 2008, finally disposed with appointment of sole arbitrator.
26 Oct 2017The petitioner, N.K. Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on 12.08.2008, seeking ...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MCGM Contract Awards in Public Interest Litigation. Court Finds No Irregularity in Tender Process and Upholds Validity of Contracts for Road Works.
5 Jul 2016The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande challenging the award of four contracts by the Municipal C...
- 131
