Search Results for "admitted sum"

5301 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5301 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Decree on Admission in Security Deposit Refund Case Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. Admissions in Letters and Financial Statements Constitute Clear and Unequivocal Admissions of Liability for Refund of Security Deposits.

The plaintiff, SRL Limited, filed a suit against Techtrek India Limited for recovery of Rs.1,58,54,200/- being the balance of security deposits paid u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debenture and Deposit Amounts — Acknowledgment of Liability Found in Correspondence. Evidentiary Value of Letters as Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, Upheld to Extend Limitation Period.

The Bombay High Court heard a Summons for Judgment in a summary suit filed by Canara Bank and others, as trustees of Canbank Mutual Fund, a trust unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Security Deposit in Leave and Licence Dispute. Court holds that unconditional leave to defend cannot be granted when defendant fails to raise triable issues and admits liability in correspondence.

The plaintiff, Sanjog Sadanand Parab, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendants, B.P. Ghard...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Winding Up Petition Based on Alleged Debt Arising Out of F&O Trades; Respondent Disputes Liability and Raises Counter-Claim for Damages

This company petition sought winding up of Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd under the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of inability to pay debts. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Loan Recovery Suit Based on Written Contracts and TDS Certificate. Loan advanced under written agreements and TDS certificate issued by defendant establishes debt; defendant's defence of no written contract rejected as moonshine.

The plaintiff, Mohandas I. Chatlani, filed a summary suit against the defendant, Varad L. Ullal, for recovery of Rs.72,68,750/- with interest. The sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Garnishee Order Against Respondent in Execution of Decree — Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets Constitutes Admission of Liability. The Court directed attachment and deposit of Rs. 17,40,82,984/- under Order XXI Rules 46 and 46A CPC, finding no real dispute under Rule 46-C.

The Applicant, Drive India Enterprises Solutions Ltd., is the Judgment Creditor in a decree dated 10th September 2018 against the Judgment Debtor, Hai...