Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Case Regarding Computation of Capital Gains on Renouncement of Right Shares. The Court held that net capital gain under Section 12B(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, must be determined after deducting loss due to depreciation in value of original shares, applying commercial principles.

In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This appeal concerned the proper computation of capital gains under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The assessee, an individual, held 710 shares as investment. The company in which she held shares issued additional shares; she became entitled to receive 710 new shares with an option to renounce them. She exercised the option to renounce by selling the right in the open market, realizing Rs. 45,262.50. Simultaneously, the market price of her original 710 shares fell from Rs. 253 per share to Rs. 198.75 per share, resulting in a capital loss of approximately Rs. 38,000. The Income-tax Officer assessed the entire sum of Rs. 45,262.50 as capital gain. The assessee claimed that the net capital gain should be determined after deducting the loss incurred on her original shares due to the fall in their value immediately after renouncement. The Income-tax authorities, the Appellate Tribunal, and the High Court all rejected this contention, holding that the receipt from renouncement constituted the whole capital gain and could not be reduced by the depreciation in the original shares. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the central legal issue was whether in computing capital gains arising from the renouncement of right shares, the assessee was entitled to set off the loss suffered on account of depreciation in the value of the original shares. The assessee argued that the true net capital gain could only be determined by considering the overall change in her capital position; merely taxing the receipt ignored the simultaneous loss. The revenue contended that the transactions were separate and the loss on original shares was not deductible from the gain on renouncement. The Supreme Court analyzed the computation of capital gains by comparing the assessee's capital asset immediately before and after renouncement. Before renouncement, her capital asset consisted of the 710 old shares valued at Rs. 253 each plus the right to take new shares (which had no cash value at that moment). After renouncement, her capital assets were the same 710 old shares, now valued at Rs. 198.75 each, plus the cash sum of Rs. 45,262.50. By applying the principle that the computation of capital gains must be based on commercial principles as understood by an ordinary man of business, the Court held that the net capital gain was the difference between the value of the entire capital asset after and before the renouncement. This resulted in a gain of Rs. 45,262.50 less the diminution in value of the old shares (Rs. 38,000 approximately). The Court thus accepted the assessee's contention that the net capital gain was not Rs. 45,262.50 but a smaller figure. The ratio decidendi was that in working out capital gain or loss, the principles applicable are those which an ordinary man of business would resort to for his business purposes, which are part of commercial practice; and that the simultaneous depreciation in the value of the original asset must be taken into account. The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the lower authorities and directed that the capital gain be computed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Capital Gains - Computation of net capital gain when part of asset yields receipt and another part depreciates - Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 12B(2) - Assessee held 710 shares as investment, renounced her right to new shares for Rs. 45,262.50, and simultaneously the value of her original shares fell by about Rs. 38,000 - Held that the net capital gain must be computed by deducting the loss suffered on the original shares from the receipt, as the principles applicable are those which an ordinary businessman would adopt in commercial practice (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether in computing capital gains arising from renouncement of right shares, the assessee is entitled to deduct the loss suffered on account of depreciation in the value of original shares

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Supreme Court held that the assessee's claim was correct; net capital gain should be computed after deducting the sum representing the loss incurred by depreciation in value of original shares. The principles to be applied are those of an ordinary man of business or commercial practice. The computation would be based on value before and after renouncement.

Law Points

  • Capital gains under Income-tax Act must be computed on commercial principles
  • net gain should reflect simultaneous loss due to depreciation of original asset
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1966 LawText (SC) (09) 23

1966-10-31

Vishishtha Bhargava, J.C. Shah, V. Ramaswami

1967 AIR 614, 1967 SCR (2) 1

Miss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by assessee against the order of the High Court affirming the rejection of her claim for set-off of loss in value of original shares against capital gains from renouncement of right shares

Remedy Sought

Assessee sought to tax only the net capital gain after deducting the loss suffered on original shares

Filing Reason

Income-tax Officer taxed the entire amount received from renouncement of right shares as capital gain without allowing deduction for loss

Previous Decisions

Income-tax Authorities, Appellate Tribunal, and High Court had all rejected the assessee's claim

Issues

Whether in computing capital gains arising from renouncement of right shares, the assessee is entitled to deduct the loss suffered on account of depreciation in the value of original shares

Submissions/Arguments

Assessee contended that the entire amount received from renouncement was not the capital gain because simultaneously she suffered loss in value of original shares, so net gain should be computed after set-off

Ratio Decidendi

In computing capital gains under the Income-tax Act, the net gain must be determined by considering the simultaneous depreciation in the value of the original capital asset resulting from a transaction that also yields a receipt. The principles to be applied are those which an ordinary man of business would resort to for business purposes, i.e., commercial principles.

Judgment Excerpts

The net capital gain could only be properly computed after deducting the sum which approximately represented the loss incurred simultaneously, by the assessee, in her original asset of 710 old shares as a result of the depreciation in their value. In working out capital gain or loss, the principles that have to be applied are those which an ordinary man of business will resort to when making computation for his business purposes, or which are a part of the commercial practice.

Procedural History

The Income-tax Officer taxed the entire amount of Rs. 45,262.50 as capital gain. The assessee's appeal to the Appellate Tribunal and then to the High Court were dismissed. The assessee then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income-tax Act, 1922: 12B(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Case Regarding Computation of Capital Gains on Renouncement of Right Shares. The Court held that net capital gain under Section 12B(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, must be determined after deducting loss d...