Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for work done under a construction contract. The plaintiff's bid was accepted on 6th April 1999, and a work order was issued on 28th April 1999. The plaintiff completed the work, and the final bill was prepared. The defendant admitted liability for the amount in the final bill but disputed certain deductions. The plaintiff filed a notice of motion under Order XII Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree on admission. The court analyzed the written statement and correspondence and found that the defendant had unequivocally admitted the plaintiff's entitlement to the amount in the final bill, subject to deductions for certain items. The court held that the admission was clear and unambiguous, and the plaintiff was entitled to a decree for the admitted amount. The court also awarded interest at 9% per annum from the date of the suit till realization. The notice of motion was allowed, and a decree was passed in favor of the plaintiff.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Decree on Admission - Order XII Rule 6 CPC - Unequivocal Admission - The court examined whether the defendant's statements in the written statement and letters constituted an unequivocal admission of liability for the amount claimed. Held that the defendant's admission that the plaintiff was entitled to payment of the amount mentioned in the final bill, subject to certain deductions, amounted to a clear admission, and the plaintiff was entitled to a decree for that amount. (Paras 1-30)

B) Contract Law - Construction Contract - Final Bill - Interest - The court considered the claim for interest on delayed payment. Held that in the absence of a contractual rate, the plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit till realization, as per Section 34 CPC. (Paras 31-35)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on the defendant's admissions in the written statement and correspondence regarding the amount due under the contract.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Notice of Motion No. 1687 of 2016 is allowed. A decree is passed in favor of the plaintiff for the amount admitted by the defendant with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the suit till realization. The suit is decreed accordingly.

Law Points

  • Order XII Rule 6 CPC
  • decree on admission
  • unequivocal admission
  • construction contract
  • work order
  • final bill
  • interest
  • pendente lite interest
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 23

Notice of Motion No. 1687 of 2016 in Suit No. 1042 of 2007

2020-02-14

N. J. Jamadar, J.

2020:BHC-OS:4127

Mr. Zubin Behramkamdin i/b Chaitanya D. Bhandarkar for plaintiff/applicant; Mr. Snehal Shah a/w Mr. Mikhail Behl i/b Kanga & Co. for defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for recovery of money under a construction contract, with a notice of motion seeking decree on admission.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for the amount claimed in the suit with interest.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to pay the amount due under the final bill for construction work completed by the plaintiff.

Issues

Whether the defendant's written statement and correspondence contain an unequivocal admission of liability entitling the plaintiff to a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. What is the rate of interest payable on the admitted amount?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that the defendant admitted liability in the written statement and letters, and thus a decree on admission should be passed. Defendant contended that there was no clear admission as deductions were disputed, and the matter required trial.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, a decree on admission can be passed if the admission is clear, unequivocal, and unconditional. The defendant's admission in the written statement and correspondence regarding the plaintiff's entitlement to the final bill amount, subject to certain deductions, constitutes a clear admission. The court can pass a decree for the admitted amount and award interest under Section 34 CPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By virtue of this notice of motion, the plaintiff seeks a decree on admission under the provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The defendant has unequivocally admitted the plaintiff's entitlement to the amount mentioned in the final bill.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Suit No. 1042 of 2007 for recovery of money. The defendant filed a written statement. The plaintiff then filed Notice of Motion No. 1687 of 2016 seeking a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The motion was heard and reserved on 5th November 2019, and judgment was pronounced on 14th February 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XII Rule 6, Section 34
  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Husband for Dowry Death Under Section 304-B IPC — Appeal Abates for Mother-In-Law. Court holds that presumption under Section 113B of Evidence Act applies when death occurs within seven years of marria...