Search Results for "administrative removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "administrative removal"

1167 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1167 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Stays Disqualification of Elected APMC Chairman in Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Election Rules, 2017 — Interim Stay Granted Because Appellate Authority Must Consider Strong and Impeccable Material Before Removal. Court held that disqualification of an elected representative cannot be founded on probabilities; pending statutory appeal under Rule 10(5) of Election Rules, 2017, the disqualification order was kept in abeyance and appeal directed to be decided within three months.

15 Jul 2025

The litigation arose from a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the Di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Naval Dockyard Worker for Unauthorized Absence — Dismisses Petition Against CAT Order. Disciplinary Authority's Discretion in Imposing Penalty of Removal for Habitual Absence Without Leave Upheld as Not Disproportionate.

7 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Arun Waman Khadtale, was initially appointed as a casual labourer in the Naval Dockyard in 1975 and was confirmed as a permanent labou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal from Service for Unauthorized Absence — Upholds Disciplinary Authority's Findings. The Court held that the penalty of removal from service for unauthorized absence of 81 days was proportionate and not shockingly disproportionate under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

30 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Madhu S. Sadlapurkar, was employed as a watchman by the Commandant, A.C. Centre and School, Ahmednagar in 1966. In March 1983, he was ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Air Force Officer in Administrative Action Under Air Force Act, 1950. Administrative dismissal under Section 19 read with Rule 16 of Air Force Rules, 1969 is not barred by the three-year limitation period for court-martial under Section 121 of the Air Force Act, 1950, as limitation applies only to trial by court-martial, not to administrative proceedings.

15 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a former Indian Air Force officer challenging his dismissal from service under the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant, commission...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Removal of Agricultural Officer for 17-Month Unauthorised Absence. Disciplinary Authority's Quantum of Punishment Not Interfered With as Misconduct Was Grave and Procedure Was Fair.

23 Feb 2026

The case involves a Writ Appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against an order of a Single Judge of the Madras High Court in WP No. 9440 of 2012 da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Port Authority's Decision to Remove Employee on Disproportionate Penalty Grounds. The Court examines whether the disciplinary authority violated principles of natural justice and statutory procedure under MPE Regulations, 1964.

17 Apr 2025

The petitioner, a Hindi Translator with the Mormugao Port Trust, faced disciplinary action culminating in his removal from service on 30.4.2011. He wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of CISF Constable Challenging Removal from Service for Unauthorized Absence. Disciplinary Authority's Order of Removal Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Misconduct of Absence Without Leave for Over 8 Months.

28 Jun 2022

The petitioner, a constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), was removed from service by an order dated 7th May 2012 issued by the Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Peon for Habitual Absence in Disciplinary Proceeding. Service Rule Violation Justifies Dismissal as Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence.

20 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Vikas Sureshrao Waghmare, was appointed as a Peon in the District Court, Ahmednagar on 11.10.2001 and made permanent from 18.04.2006. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Peon for Habitual Absence in Disciplinary Proceedings. Administrative Appeal Dismissed as Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence and Disobeyed Transfer Orders.

20 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Vikas Sureshrao Waghmare, was appointed as a Peon in the District Court, Ahmednagar on 11.10.2001 and was made permanent from 18.04.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside CAT Order in Railway Employee Removal Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Compliance with IRVM Paras 704/705 and Competent Authority Issue. The Tribunal failed to consider whether charges were proved despite procedural irregularities, as required by Moni Shankar v. Union of India.

3 Oct 2012

The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of the Central Administrat...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)