Search Results for "Tenant Cooperative Society"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cooperative Housing Dispute — Upholds Cooperative Court's Order for Transfer of Flat. Transfer of share and interest in a tenant co-partnership society requires compliance with by-laws and rules; society cannot refuse transfer without valid reason.

The Petitioner, Smt. Geeta Narayan Parvati, was a lecturer and member of Respondent No.2 Society, a tenant co-partnership society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Orders of Cooperative Authorities. Bylaws of Society Held Binding Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Shantiniketan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., a registered cooperative housing society under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit — Lease Deed Interpretation and Rent Arrears Calculation. Landlord's Unilateral Adjustment of Security Deposit Held Invalid; Notice of Demand Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act Not Proven.

The appellant, Chandiram Dariyanumal Ahuja, was a tenant of a shop block owned by the respondent, Akola Zilla Shram Wahtuk Sahakari Sanstha, under a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...