Search Results for "Sales Tax Demand"

671 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 671 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Sales Tax Case — Sale to Purchaser's Branches in Another State Constitutes Inter-State Sale Under Section 3(a) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Movement of Goods from Maharashtra to Vapi and Silvasa Occasioned by Sale, Hence Inter-State Sale.

The applicant, M/s K.C. Metal Industries, a manufacturer and seller of copper strips and bars registered under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Liquidator's Petition Against Service Tax Demand on Deemed Sale Transaction. VAT Already Levied on Same Transaction Under MVAT Act Precludes Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Nayana Premji Savala, as Liquidator of Swire Oilfield Services India Private Limited (company in liquidation), filed a writ petition c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Favor of Dealer in Sales Tax Case Regarding Packing Materials Used in Exports. Purchase Tax Not Leviable on Packing Materials Sold Along with Exported Goods Under Section 14 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The case involves a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Tax Revision Against Tribunal Order Restoring Equal Addition and Penalty Under TNVAT Act, 2006. Taxpayer Argues Stock Variation Computed from Notional Trading Method Without Physical Verification Cannot Sustain Penalty Under Section 27(3)(c).

The case involved a tax revision petition filed by M/s. Vista Garments, a registered dealer under the CGST Act, 2017, engaged in manufacturing hosiery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.

The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part and Reverses High Court's Decision that Electricity is Not 'Goods' Under Sales Tax Acts. Electricity is Movable Property and Covered by Definition of 'Goods', Making Electricity Board a Dealer; Supply of Steam Under Works Contract Not Taxable.

The case concerned the taxability under the C.P. & Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, and the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959, of transactions unde...