Search Results for "Right to know"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dismissal of Appeal Based on Cumulative Facts and Conditional Bail. Upholding the Grant of Bail: No Grounds for Entertaining the Appeal

Concerning the bail granted to Mrityunjay Kumar Singh, also known as Mrityunjay or Sonu Singh, by the High Court of Jharkhand. The Union of India appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Karikho Kri's Election in Arunachal Pradesh: Non-Disclosure of Assets Not Grounds for Invalidating Election. Supreme Court reverses High Court ruling, finds no substantial defect or corrupt practice in Karikho Kri's election despite asset non-disclosures.

The Supreme Court of India set aside a High Court ruling that had declared the election of Karikho Kri void due to non-disclosure of certain assets an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Multiple Candidature Provision in Election Law. Constitutional validity of Section 33(7) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 upheld as matter of legislative policy, not violating Articles 14 or 19.

The petitioner invoked the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution to challenge the constitutional validity of Section 33(7)...