Search Results for "Railway Recruitment Board"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Railway Recruitment Board"

185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Railway Employment Scheme Due to Constitutional Infirmities. The Court held that the Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as a back-door entry mechanism, and its termination by the Railway Board was justified, with no vested rights accruing to affected parties.

25 Jan 2022

The dispute centered on the constitutional validity and termination of the Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway Board's Petition Challenging CAT Order in Service Matter - Respondent's Past Service as Assistant Research Officer Not Considered for Pensionary Benefits Under Railway Service Rules.

10 Dec 2014

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by the Railway Board and others against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Bangalor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Employer's Stand in Service Recruitment Matter; Reserved Category Candidates Who Availed Age and Physical Relaxations Cannot Be Migrated to Unreserved Vacancies. Standing Order No. 85 Para 14(f) Prevails Over Standing Order No. 78 Para 14(b) Pursuant to Revised Directive No. 29 Dated 06.12.2013, Barring Migration of Relaxation-Availing Reserved Candidates to Unreserved Posts.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Railway Board through Employment Notice No. 1/2013 dated 06.12.2013 for filling 659 post...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Termination of Railway Trainee for Failing G&SR Training; High Court Had Set Aside Termination. Appeal by Employer Challenges High Court's Finding That No Departmental Examination Was Prescribed for Senior Section Engineer Post Under Master Circular No.29.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from the termination of a railway trainee from the post of Apprentice/Trainee Senior Section Engineer (SSE) after he failed the Gene...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Former Railway Employee Against Kerala State Electricity Board in Weightage Benefit Dispute — Railway Service Held to Be Central Government Service for Pensionary Weightage. Board's Own Orders and Settlements Recognizing Former Government Service for Weightage Are Binding, and Recovery from Retired Employee Without Misrepresentation Is Impermissible.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Bency John, joined the Indian Railways as a Junior Draftsman on 9th August 1990 and rendered over ten years of regular pensionable serv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands MACP Benefit Dispute to Tribunal for Fresh Adjudication on Railway Employees' Financial Upgradation. The Court set aside the orders of the High Court and Tribunal, directing fresh consideration of the circular dated 12.09.2012 and Clause 129 of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual.

4 Feb 2020

The Union of India and the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, appealed against the order of the Kerala High Court which affirmed t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Challenge to CAT Order in Recruitment Dispute — Typographical Error in Date of Birth Does Not Disqualify Candidate. The court held that a bona fide typographical error in the application form should not be a ground to reject candidature when the candidate is otherwise eligible.

19 Apr 2006

The respondent, Nandkishore Khatib Jangad, applied for the post of Khalasi with the Western Railway. In his application form, he inadvertently mention...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for offering employment to displaced persons does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for preferential treatment to land oustees does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Direction to Consider Compassionate Appointment for Son of Deceased Railway Employee. CAT Erred in Refusing to Follow Railway Board Circular on Second Marriage as Upheld by Bombay High Court.

1 Apr 2016

The Union of India (Railways) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 6 March 2014 and 26 August 2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)