Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Service Tax on Lottery Tickets Case — Holds That Service Tax on Promotion, Marketing, and Sale of Lottery Tickets Is Within Parliament's Competence Under Entry 97 List I Read With Article 248 of the Constitution, and Not Exclusively Within State's Domain Under Entry 62 List II. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 levying service tax on services related to lotteries, reversing the Sikkim High Court's decision.

3 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals led by Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the constitutional validity of amendme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Lottery Allotment of Large Gala in APMC Market, Sets Aside High Court's Order Directing Allotment to Respondent No.2. The Court held that the High Court erred in relying on an earlier order of the Director of Agricultural Marketing without independently assessing eligibility, and that the lottery method was valid.

10 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Bombay High Court's judgment dated 21.11.2018, which directed the allotment of large Gala No.F-158 in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

29 Sep 2015

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Elections to Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Notification Requirement. Court holds that elections cannot be ordered until State Government issues notification under Section 13(1B) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963, specifying number of members and reserved categories.

19 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Shekhar Ramchandra Badade, claiming to be an agriculturist and member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Neera, filed a wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

16 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

17 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)