Search Results for "GSTN Portal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "GSTN Portal"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.

20 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...

High Court

Writ Petition challenging Show Cause Notice for input tax credit reversal due to non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 caused by GST portal functionality issues.

8 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court quashed the show cause notice issued to Tikona Infinet Private Limited, which alleged wrongful availing of ITC due to non-electr...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit to branch.

28 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 Form for Cenvat Credit Carry Forward Due to Inadvertent Error. The court permitted the petitioner to correct an inadvertent transfer of credit to a branch in Hyderabad, directing the respondents to allow filing of a revised TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of the CGST Act, 2017.

28 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of GSTR-1 in GST Case Due to Human Error and No Revenue Loss. Rule of purposive interpretation applied to permit correction of inadvertent reporting of wrong GSTINs under Section 37 of CGST Act, 2017.

14 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Star Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing and supplying electronic components to Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL). D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST Paid on Exported Goods Despite Claim of Higher Drawback Rate. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST under Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act read with Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, as selection of higher drawback column does not disentitle refund.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kunal Housewares Private Limited, exported stainless steel household articles in July, August, and September 2017. The petitioner paid...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

High Court

Petitioner’s Appeal Reinstated as Dismissal Grounds Found Invalid; Directions Issued for De Novo Consideration. High Court quashes Appellate Authority's dismissal due to procedural irregularities and remands for reconsideration.

11 Nov 2024

The High Court quashed the impugned order dismissing the Petitioner’s appeal due to alleged non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements and lack of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit for Export of Services Under IGST Act — Rejects Revenue's Contention of Non-Compliance with Pre-Audit Requirement. The court held that rule 96(10) of CGST Rules applies only to refund of integrated tax paid on export, not to refund of unutilized input tax credit under section 54 of CGST Act.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioner, BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing information technology and...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)