COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION(L) NO. 6451 OF 2020
16 Mar 2022The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, pronounced judgment on 16 March 2022 in a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitrat...
Search Results for "Dissenting Award"
118 result(s) found
Found 118 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.
10 Feb 2015The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...
- 199
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Petitions Challenging Conflicting Stock Exchange Arbitral Awards. Court Focuses on Whether Same Arbitrator's Contradictory Findings on Identical Facts Vitiated Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Sep 2025Three petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challeng...
High Court
High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.
17 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...
- 230
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute — Upholds Majority Award on Misrepresentation of Receivables. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on misrepresentation and damages were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Mar 2012The petitioner, GWL Properties Ltd. (formerly Gordon Woodroffe Ltd.), challenged a majority arbitral award dated 31 August 2009 under Section 34 of th...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Price Adjustment Dispute Under World Bank-Financed Contract. Court Upholds Majority Award's Interpretation of Price Adjustment Clause but Modifies Interest Rate from 18% to 12%.
1 Oct 2012The petitioner, M/s. Angerlehner Structurals & Civil Engineering Co., was awarded a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MMC) for ...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Developer Against Dissenting Society Members. The Court held that balance of convenience favored appointment of Receiver to preserve subject matter pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Sep 2013The petitioner, Shree Krishna Homes Pvt. Ltd., a developer, entered into a development agreement dated 14th December 2011 with respondent No.1, a coop...
- 176
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds International Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — Damages Awarded for Breach of Contract. Division Bench of Delhi High Court Erred in Setting Aside Majority Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.
17 Dec 2020The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against a Division Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court that had set aside a majority international arbit...
- 202
High Court
High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitrator's Awards in Charterparty Dispute. Court Confirms That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Are Not Open to Reappraisal Under Section 34.
27 Mar 2012The Petitioner, Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF), a public sector company, entered into an Agreement of Affreightment with the Respondent,...
- 105
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitrator's Discretion on Post-Award Interest. The Court held that under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitrator has discretion to determine the quantum for post-award interest, and since the award specified interest only on the principal, the statutory default did not apply.
1 Sep 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dismissing an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which ch...
- 207
