Search Results for "Deficient Stamp Duty"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Penalty in Stamp Duty Dispute for Deed of Assent Treated as Gift Deed. Collector's Imposition of Maximum Ten-Times Penalty Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Discretionary Exercise.

The case involves a dispute over stamp duty and penalty imposed on a Deed of Assent executed by the Trustees of H.C. Dhanda Trust. Late Shri Harish Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Sale Agreement. Recital of Possession in Agreement Not Conclusive When Only 15% Consideration Paid; Refund Admissible Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 19 March 2020, by which the petitioners agreed to purchase a flat in Karad, Satara for a total cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Demand on Agreement for Sale. Agreement for Sale Without Possession Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Nirmala Manherlal Shah, entered into an agreement for sale of immovable property in Mumbai. The agreement did not involve delivery of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...