Search Results for "Deemed Permission"

2970 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2970 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Municipal Council Dispute — Costs Imposed to Compensate Prejudice. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events under Section 189(6) of Maharashtra Municipal Council Act allowed to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

The petitioner, Sau. Lata w/o Kailash Bankar, filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. After filing the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion Permission Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Deemed Permission Granted Due to Delay. Failure to Obtain No-Objection Certificates Not a Valid Ground for Rejection After Expiry of 90-Day Period.

The petitioner, Rajendra s/o Durgadas Taori, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 05/06/2006 rejecting his application under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA in Favor of Housing Societies. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA even if the developer retains development rights over part of the land.

The Petitioner-Developer, Kiran Builders Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15 May 2017 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...