Search Results for "Coparcenary Rights"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Appeals Against Temporary Injunction in Hindu Joint Family Partition Suit. Court Examines Whether a Coparcener Can Seek Injunction Against Other Coparceners Under Hindu Law and Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appeals arose from an order dated 4 February 2022 passed by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Sangli, allowing an application at Exhibit-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Daughters Cannot Claim Share in Coparcenary Property Allotted to Father Before 20th December 2004. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is prospective and does not affect partitions effected prior to the amendment.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Coparcenary Share Under Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act Despite Father's Death Before 1956 Act. Daughter Granted 1/4th Share in Suit Property as Amendment is Retrospective and Confers Coparcenary Rights from Birth.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a partiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Coparcenary Rights and Validity of Sale Deeds. The Court held that property inherited under Mitakshara law remains coparcenary, and a coparcener by birth can challenge alienations without legal necessity.

The present civil appeal arises from a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Village Khangarh, District Ferozepur, Punjab. The appellant, A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Daughters' Partition Suit Against Alienation by Father — Sale Deed Set Aside as Not Binding on Coparcenary. Daughters are coparceners by birth under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and alienation without legal necessity is invalid.

The appellants, three daughters of Mallikarjuna Balikai, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit properties and for a declaration t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Purchaser Against High Court Decision That Compromise Decree Does Not Bind Coparceners. Property Reacquired by Coparceners Through Court Decree Retains Joint Family Character, Requiring Consent of All Coparceners for Valid Compromise Under Hindu Law.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the High Court's judgment which declared that a compromise decree dated 25 March 1976, entered into betw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Modifies Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit, Applies Vineetha Sharma Principles Under Hindu Succession Act. Daughter Entitled to 1/9 Share as Coparcener Under Central Act 39 of 2005, Irrespective of Father's Death Before 2005 and Regardless of Date of Marriage.

The judgment arises from a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the preliminary decree dated 25.02.2016 pas...