Search Results for "Coal India Limited"

700 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 700 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Coke Industry Against Coal India Over Pricing Dispute — Linked Price vs. Liberalised Sales Scheme (LSS) Price. Court Holds That Resolution of Linkage Committee Did Not Confer Right to Preferential Price, and Price Was to Be Charged as Prevalent at Any Point of Time.

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s S.K.J. Coke Industries Ltd. and its predecessor Mahabir Coke Industries (appellants) and Coal India Ltd. a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Coal India Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Inquiry Held Before Dismissal Based on Self-Declaration. Rule 34(1)(ii) of Coal India Executives Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 Requires Inquiry Before Penalty of Removal.

The petitioner, Shri Sheopurari Singh, was employed as Deputy General Manager (Vigilance) in M-1 Grade at the Vigilance Department of Western Coalfiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment for Married Daughter of Deceased Employee in Coal India Ltd. Case. Rejection on Ground of Marriage Held Discriminatory and Contrary to Precedent.

The petitioners, including Mrs. Tanuja (married daughter of the deceased employee) and other family members, challenged a communication dated 10/04/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Royalty on Run-of-Mine Coal for Period Prior to Insertion of Rule 64B and 64C in Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Processed or Beneficiated Coal Attracts Royalty After Effective Date of Notification Dated 25th September, 2000.

The dispute involved multiple appeals before the Supreme Court arising out of conflicting interpretations of the stage at which royalty becomes payabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down BCCL's Tender Decision for Arbitrariness and Discrimination. The Supreme Court upholds fairness and transparency in government contracts, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles.

The court held that government authorities, while exercising discretion in contractual matters, must ensure fairness, transparency, and equality. The ...