Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 447 r/w 34 IPC Quashed as Abuse of Process of Law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Vasudeo Chatumal Jhamnani, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 42 of 2011 registered at Police Station Hingna, Nagpur for offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 447 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The FIR was lodged by respondent no.2, Smt. Rajubai Vijay Meshram, alleging that the applicant and another accused had conspired to grab ancestral land bearing Khasra No.72 by preparing bogus documents and encroaching upon the land. The first informant claimed that her father owned the land and that a civil suit for partition and possession had been decreed in 2006, with revenue entries mutated accordingly. The applicant contended that the dispute was purely civil in nature, as the land holding had been converted to Class I from Class II and he was in possession under an agreement to sell. The court examined the allegations and found that the dispute essentially related to title and possession of land, which had already been the subject matter of a civil suit. The court held that the criminal proceedings were an abuse of the process of law and that the FIR was liable to be quashed to prevent miscarriage of justice. The court allowed the application and quashed the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - Dispute pertained to land where civil suit for partition was already decreed and revenue entries were mutated - Allegations of forgery and cheating were made against the applicant who claimed possession under an agreement to sell - Court held that the dispute was essentially civil in nature and the criminal proceedings were an abuse of the process of law - Held that FIR liable to be quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR lodged under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 447 r/w 34 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the ground that the dispute is essentially civil in nature and the criminal proceedings are an abuse of the process of law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The FIR bearing Crime No. 42 of 2011 registered at Police Station Hingna, Nagpur under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 447 r/w 34 IPC is quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Criminal proceedings cannot be used as a tool for recovery of civil dues
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC when dispute is predominantly civil in nature
  • Abuse of process of court when criminal machinery is used to settle civil disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (04) 83

Criminal Application No. 352 of 2011

2012-04-18

A.P. Bhangale, J.

Smt. Neeta Jog for the Applicant, Mr. V.A. Thakare, A.P.P. for Respondent no.1, Mr. R.M. Daga for Respondent no.2

Vasudeo s/o. Chatumal Jhamnani

The State of Maharashtra, Smt. Rajubai w/o. Vijay Meshram

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside of FIR No. 42 of 2011 registered at Police Station Hingna, Nagpur

Filing Reason

Allegations of criminal conspiracy, forgery, cheating, and encroachment in relation to ancestral land

Previous Decisions

Civil Suit No. 925 of 1998 was decreed on 21.11.2006 declaring shares, and revenue entries were mutated accordingly

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses any criminal offence or is purely civil in nature? Whether the criminal proceedings amount to an abuse of the process of law?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the dispute is civil in nature and the FIR is an abuse of process. Respondent no.2 argued that the applicant prepared bogus documents and encroached upon the land.

Ratio Decidendi

When the dispute is essentially civil in nature and the criminal proceedings are initiated with ulterior motive to pressurize the opposite party, the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process of court.

Judgment Excerpts

By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant has prayed for to quash and set aside the First Information Report lodged by respondent no.2 bearing Crime No.42 of 2011 dt.1.4.2011 at Police Station, Hingna, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 447 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is the contention on behalf of the applicant that holding of the land was converted to Class I from Class II under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and the applicant is in possession of the land under an agreement to sell.

Procedural History

FIR No. 42 of 2011 was registered on 1.4.2011 at Police Station Hingna, Nagpur. The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 352 of 2011 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR. The application was heard and reserved on 9.4.2012 and judgment pronounced on 18.4.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 420, 467, 471, 447, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition in Customs Smuggling Case — CEGAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Confiscation of Foreign Currency Set Aside as Revenue Failed to Prove Smuggling or Fraudulent Procurement of Currency Declarati...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference of Tenancy Claim to Mamlatdar in Partition Suit. Civil Court's Order to Refer Tenancy Dispute to Mamlatdar Under Section 7 of Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 Upheld a...