High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.2 in Cyber Crime Case Involving Cheating and Outraging Modesty of Woman. Petitioner enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) BNS and 66(D) IT Act, subject to conditions.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Avinash, accused No.2 in Crime No.794/2024 registered by South East CEN Crime Police Station, Bengaluru City, filed a criminal petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking regular bail. The FIR was registered on 24.08.2024 based on a complaint by Ms. Manthalir N, daughter of Keshav Singh K, against unknown persons for offences punishable under Sections 318(4) (cheating by personation by using computer resource), 319(2) (cheating by personation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 66(D) (cheating by personation by using computer resource) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act). During investigation, the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner's bail application before the Sessions Court (Crl.Misc.No.264/2025) was rejected on 21.01.2025. Hence, the petitioner approached the High Court. The High Court heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional SPP for the respondent-State. The Court noted that the investigation was completed and charge sheet had been filed. Considering that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner was not required and that the petitioner was a permanent resident of Goa, the Court allowed the petition and granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety, appearing before the Investigating Officer as and when required, not tampering with prosecution witnesses, and not leaving the jurisdiction of the trial court without prior permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Regular Bail - Section 483 BNSS, 2023 - Petitioner/accused No.2 sought regular bail in Crime No.794/2024 for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) BNS and 66(D) IT Act - Court considered that investigation was completed, charge sheet filed, and custodial interrogation was not required - Held that petitioner is entitled to bail subject to conditions (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner/accused No.2 is entitled to regular bail in Crime No.794/2024 for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of BNS, 2023 and 66(D) of IT Act, 2000.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner/accused No.2 is ordered to be released on regular bail in Crime No.794/2024 of South East CEN Crime Police Station, Bengaluru City, pending on the file of 45th ACJM Court, Bengaluru, subject to executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the trial court. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, shall not tamper with prosecution witnesses, and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial court without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Regular bail
  • Section 483 BNSS
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Section 66(D) IT Act
  • Section 318(4) BNS
  • Section 319(2) BNS
  • Section 113(3) BNS
  • Section 113(4) BNS
  • Prima facie case
  • Investigation
  • Custodial interrogation
  • Conditions of bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (03) 16

CRL.P No. 893 of 2025

2025-03-11

S Vishwajith Shetty

NC: 2025:KHC:10169

Sri. Vachan Gowda (for petitioner), Smt. Pushpalatha, Additional SPP and Sri. Vinay Mahadevaiah, HCGP (for respondent)

Avinash

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 483 BNSS seeking regular bail in a cyber crime case.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/accused No.2 sought regular bail in Crime No.794/2024.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody; his bail application was rejected by the Sessions Court on 21.01.2025.

Previous Decisions

The Principal LXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCH-62) rejected the petitioner's bail application in Crl.Misc.No.264/2025 on 21.01.2025.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 BNSS.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued for bail. Learned Additional SPP opposed the bail petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail subject to conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

Accused No.2 in Crime No.794/2024 registered by South East CEN Crime Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of BNS, 2023 and 66(D) of Information Technology Act, 2000 is before this Court under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023 seeking regular bail. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, since the investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.

Procedural History

FIR in Crime No.794/2024 was registered on 24.08.2024 by South East CEN Crime Police Station, Bengaluru City against unknown persons. During investigation, petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. Petitioner filed bail application before the Sessions Court (Crl.Misc.No.264/2025), which was rejected on 21.01.2025. Thereafter, petitioner filed the present petition under Section 483 BNSS before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS): 483
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS): 318(4), 319(2), 113(3), 113(4)
  • Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act): 66(D)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.2 in Cyber Crime Case Involving Cheating and Outraging Modesty of Woman. Petitioner enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) BNS and 66(D) IT Act, subject to ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order in Company Petition for Oppression and Mismanagement — Upholds Finding That Petition Was Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Consent Under Section 399 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that cons...