Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Denial of Appointment for Non-Submission of NOC from Previous Employer. ONGC's requirement of NOC from previous employer held not mandatory where candidate had already resigned and was not seeking lien or deputation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Shantaram Gunjal, was selected by ONGC for the post of Junior Engineering Assistant (Electrical) pursuant to an advertisement. He was issued an appointment order on April 13, 2023, but was not allowed to join because he had not disclosed his previous employment with Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited (RCF) and had not submitted a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from RCF at the time of document verification on January 9, 2023. The petitioner had resigned from RCF on December 30, 2022, and his resignation was accepted on January 5, 2023. He argued that since he had already resigned, there was no requirement to submit an NOC. ONGC contended that the petitioner suppressed his employment with RCF and failed to produce the NOC, which was a mandatory requirement. The court examined the relevant clauses of the advertisement and the appointment letter. It found that the requirement of NOC was applicable only to candidates who were already in government or public sector employment and sought to join on lien or deputation. Since the petitioner had resigned and was not seeking any such benefit, the condition did not apply. The court also noted that the petitioner had disclosed his employment with RCF in his application and that the suppression allegation was not sustainable. The court allowed the petition, quashed the communication denying appointment, and directed ONGC to permit the petitioner to join within two weeks.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Appointment - No Objection Certificate - Requirement of NOC from previous employer is not mandatory where the candidate has already resigned and is not seeking lien or deputation - The court held that the condition of submitting NOC is intended to regulate cases where the candidate seeks to join on lien or deputation, and cannot be used to deny appointment to a candidate who has already severed ties with the previous employer (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether denial of appointment to a selected candidate on the ground of non-submission of No Objection Certificate from his previous employer is justified when the candidate had already resigned from the previous employment and was not seeking lien or deputation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the communication denying appointment, and directed ONGC to permit the petitioner to join the post within two weeks.

Law Points

  • No Objection Certificate
  • appointment
  • previous employer
  • public sector undertaking
  • resignation
  • lien
  • deputation
  • document verification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (07) 49

Writ Petition No. 7000 of 2023

2023-07-11

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Sandeep V. Marne

2023:BHC-AS:19609-DB

S. S. Pakale a/w. Pranit Kulkarni, Saurabh Pakale i/b. Padmaja U. Malgaonkar for Petitioner; Karthik Somashundaram a/w. Alabh Lal i/b. M/s. Bharucha & Partners for Respondent No.1

Chandan Shantaram Gunjal

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging denial of appointment for non-submission of No Objection Certificate from previous employer.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to ONGC to permit him to join the post of Junior Engineering Assistant (Electrical) pursuant to appointment order dated April 13, 2023.

Filing Reason

ONGC denied appointment to petitioner on the ground that he failed to submit No Objection Certificate from his previous employer RCF and suppressed his employment with RCF.

Issues

Whether denial of appointment to a selected candidate on the ground of non-submission of No Objection Certificate from his previous employer is justified when the candidate had already resigned from the previous employment and was not seeking lien or deputation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he had already resigned from RCF and therefore no NOC was required; he had disclosed his employment in the application. Respondent argued that the petitioner suppressed his employment and failed to produce NOC which was a mandatory requirement.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement of No Objection Certificate from previous employer is not mandatory where the candidate has already resigned and is not seeking lien or deputation. The condition is intended to regulate cases where the candidate seeks to join on lien or deputation, and cannot be used to deny appointment to a candidate who has already severed ties with the previous employer.

Judgment Excerpts

Denial of appointment to Petitioner on the ground of his failure to submit No Objection Certificate from his previous employer is the issue involved in the present petition. The requirement of NOC is applicable only to candidates who are already in government or public sector employment and seek to join on lien or deputation.

Procedural History

Petitioner was selected by ONGC and issued appointment order on April 13, 2023. He was not allowed to join due to non-submission of NOC. He filed the present writ petition challenging the denial.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Denial of Appointment for Non-Submission of NOC from Previous Employer. ONGC's requirement of NOC from previous employer held not mandatory where candidate had already resigned and was not seeking lien or dep...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Government Order Cancelling Fair Price Shop Authorization — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order. Secretary's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider relevant material.