Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company Liability in Motor Accident Claim Despite Dishonoured Cheque — Insurer Must Pay Third Party Compensation and Recover from Insured. The court held that under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party even if the policy was cancelled due to dishonour of premium cheque, as the cancellation was not communicated to the third party.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 123
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the appellant, National Insurance Company Ltd., challenged the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Darwah, which granted compensation to the legal heirs of Rameshlal Jaiswal, who died in a road accident. The accident occurred on 31/10/2005 when Rameshlal was riding his motorcycle and was hit by a taxi driven rashly and negligently. He sustained grievous injuries and later died. The claimants sought compensation of Rs.1,50,000 from the taxi owner and the insurance company. The insurance company resisted, arguing that the accident was caused by the deceased's own negligence and that the taxi's insurance policy was not valid because the cheque for premium had been dishonoured. The Tribunal, however, found the taxi driver negligent and awarded compensation. On appeal, the High Court examined the issue of whether the insurance company is liable despite the dishonoured cheque. The court noted that the policy was issued and was in force at the time of the accident. The cancellation of the policy due to cheque dishonour was not communicated to the third party. Relying on the principle that the insurance company is liable to third parties under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the court held that the insurer must pay the compensation and then recover the amount from the insured. The appeal was dismissed, and the award was upheld.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Third Party Liability - Dishonoured Cheque - Insurance Policy - Section 147, 149 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The issue was whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party when the cheque issued for premium was dishonoured and the policy was cancelled prior to the accident. The court held that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to the third party and then recover the amount from the insured, as the policy was in force at the time of the accident and the cancellation was not communicated to the third party. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party when the cheque issued for premium was dishonoured and the policy was cancelled before the accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Darwah, dated 27/07/2011 in Claim Petition No. 336/2006 is upheld. The insurance company is directed to pay the compensation amount to the claimants and is entitled to recover the same from the insured.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Dishonoured Cheque
  • Third Party Liability
  • Insurance Policy
  • Section 147 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 253

First Appeal No. 508/2012

2017-07-26

Dr. Smt. Shalini PhansalkarJoshi, J.

Shri Shashikant Borkar for appellant, Shri Vivek Awchat for respondent nos.1(A) to 1(D), Shri A.S. Ghatole for respondent no.2

National Insurance Company Ltd.

Rameshlal Champalal Jaiswal (Dead, through legal heirs) and Dilip Keshaorao Sargar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant insurance company sought to set aside the award of compensation to the claimants.

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the award on the ground that the policy was not valid due to dishonour of premium cheque.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Darwah, passed award dated 27/07/2011 in Claim Petition No. 336/2006, granting compensation to the claimants.

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party when the cheque for premium was dishonoured and the policy was cancelled before the accident.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant insurance company argued that the accident was caused by the deceased's own negligence and that the policy was not valid as the cheque for premium was dishonoured. Claimants argued that the taxi driver was negligent and the insurance company is liable to pay compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even if the policy was cancelled due to dishonour of premium cheque, as the cancellation was not communicated to the third party. The insurer can recover the amount from the insured.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is preferred challenging the judgment and award dated 27/07/2011 passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Darwah in Claim Petition No. 336/2006. On 31/10/2005, one Rameshlal was proceeding from Arni to Anjankhed on his Bajaj M80 motorcycle... It is the appellant, insurance company, which resisted the claim petition contending inter alia that the cause of the accident was the rash and negligent driving of the injured himself...

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Darwah, which awarded compensation. The insurance company appealed to the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 147, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Insolvency Proceedings Under IBC Over Defunct Scheme of Arrangement -- IBC Prevails Over Companies Act in Recovery of Defaulted Loans
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Issues Mandamus Directing Correction of Property Tax Receipt Name; Condemns Official Inaction and Imposes Costs. Writ Petition Allowed as Respondents Failed to Rectify Mistake Despite Khata Transfer and Repeated Requests, Contravening Inst...