WRIT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2025
23 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"
730 result(s) found
Found 730 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Panchayat Order for Demolition of Toilet Constructed on Common Well. Construction of Toilet and Septic Tank on a Common Well Without Permission Violates Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Public Health Norms.
18 Oct 2023The petitioner, Milagrina D'Mello, and the first respondent, John Gonsalves, are neighbours sharing a common well on the boundary of their properties....
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.
3 May 2023The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.
12 Jan 2022The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company Challenging Property Tax Demand by Gram Panchayat on Land Within MIDC Area. Gram Panchayat Cannot Levy Tax on Land Already Subject to MIDC Levy Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.
13 Apr 2016The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing two and three wheelers, has its registered ...
- 382
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.
9 May 2014The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.
17 Oct 2012The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Challenging Property Tax Levy by Gram Panchayat. Held that property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits under Section 124 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable.
31 Jan 2011The petitioner, M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd., a company manufacturing automobiles, challenged the property tax demands issued by the Gram Panchayat...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Village Panchayat's Writ Petitions as Not Maintainable Against Orders of Additional Director of Panchayats Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 — Panchayat Cannot Challenge Appellate Orders Passed Under Section 66(7) of the Act.
13 Aug 2010The High Court of Bombay at Goa was hearing two writ petitions filed by Village Panchayats of Sancoale and Bastora against orders passed by the Additi...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...
- 72
