Supreme Court Upholds Claim of Absorbed Physical Training Instructors for Dearness Allowance and Related Allowances under N.D.S.I. Scheme. The Court Interprets Appointment Order Conditions to Hold That Pay Parity with State Employees and Allowance Protection as per Central Government Rates on Absorption Date, with Reimbursement to State, Governs the Dispute.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute concerned the absorption of Physical Training Instructors from Central Government service to Haryana State Service under the N.D.S.I. Scheme. The respondents were originally appointed as Physical Training Instructors by the Central Government and were later appointed by the State Government of Haryana on October 14, 1976, pursuant to a decision to absorb N.D.S. Instructors in State Service with effect from July 1, 1976. The appointment order contained specific conditions. Condition No.9 stated that from the date of absorption, he/she would be entitled to all allowances admissible to other State Government employees of that cadre. Condition No.10 provided that the pay and allowance received under the Central Government at the time of absorption would be protected, specifically Dearness Allowance, Dearness Pay, Interim Relief, and Additional Dearness Allowances. Paragraph 15 of the order stated that the total expenditure on pay and allowances of N.D.S. Instructors would continue to be reimbursed by the Government of India to the State Government until they remained in the cadre of P.E.T. in which they were absorbed. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana had passed an order dated August 4, 1994 in C.W.P. No. 2558 of 1991, which was challenged by the State of Haryana before the Supreme Court by special leave. The core legal issue was the interpretation of the absorption conditions regarding pay parity and protection of allowances. The Supreme Court examined the appointment order and held that the respondents, who were absorbed as P.E.Ts. or D.P.Es. with effect from July 1, 1976, were entitled to pay on par with State Government employees, while allowances such as Dearness Allowance and Interim Relief would be as admissible to Central Government employees on the date of absorption. The Court further held that any claims laid by the respondents in respect of dearness allowance etc., as enumerated in clause 10 of the appointment order, must be given to the respondents as admissible on the date of absorption, i.e., October 1976. The State Government in turn would be entitled to reimbursement from the Central Government. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the appeal against respondent Nos. 28, 84, and 90 standing abated as they were reported dead. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Absorption and Pay Protection - Entitlement to Dearness Allowance and Other Allowances on Absorption - Not mentioned - The respondents, formerly Central Government Physical Training Instructors, were absorbed into Haryana State Service under the N.D.S.I. Scheme with effect from July 1, 1976; their appointment order conditions 9, 10 and paragraph 15 provided that pay would be on par with State Government employees while allowances like Dearness Allowance, Dearness Pay, Interim Relief and Additional Dearness Allowances would be protected as admissible to Central Government employees on the date of absorption, and the State would be reimbursed by the Central Government until they remained in the P.E.T. cadre - The Supreme Court held that claims relating to such allowances must be granted as admissible on the date of absorption, i.e., October 1976, and the State Government is entitled to reimbursement from the Central Government (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether respondents, absorbed from Central Government service into Haryana State Service as Physical Training Instructors, are entitled to pay and allowances as per Central Government rates or State Government rates, and the extent of reimbursement to State by Centre

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal disposed of; claims of respondents in respect of dearness allowance etc. as enumerated in clause 10 of the order of appointment to be given to respondents as admissible on the date of absorption (October 1976); State Government entitled to reimbursement from Central Government; appeal against respondent Nos. 28, 84, 90 abated as they are dead; no costs.

Law Points

  • Absorbed Central Government employees are entitled to pay parity with State Government employees
  • Allowances like Dearness Allowance
  • Dearness Pay
  • Interim Relief
  • Additional Dearness Allowances are protected as admissible to Central Government employees on the date of absorption
  • Central Government must reimburse State Government for expenditure on absorbed N.D.S.I. instructors until they remain in P.E.T. cadre
  • Claims under clause 10 of appointment order to be granted as on date of absorption
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (08) 45

1995-08-24

K. Ramaswamy, B.L. Hansaria

JT 1995 (6) 659, 1995 SCALE (5)215

State of Haryana and Another

D. L. Uppal and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service law dispute concerning absorption of N.D.S.I. instructors from Central Government to Haryana State service and their entitlement to pay and allowances.

Remedy Sought

State of Haryana and another filed appeal by special leave against the Punjab and Haryana High Court order; respondents sought their claims for dearness allowance, dearness pay, interim relief and additional dearness allowances as per appointment conditions; State sought to challenge High Court's decision.

Filing Reason

The dispute arose over interpretation of conditions of absorption order regarding protection of Central Government allowances and reimbursement; High Court had decided in writ petition C.W.P. No. 2558 of 1991.

Previous Decisions

Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court passed order dated August 4, 1994 in C.W.P. No. 2558 of 1991, which was challenged in this appeal.

Issues

Whether respondents absorbed into Haryana State Service under N.D.S.I. Scheme are entitled to allowances as per Central Government rates or State Government rates Extent of reimbursement by Central Government to State Government for expenditure on pay and allowances

Ratio Decidendi

Respondents absorbed from Central Government into Haryana State Service are entitled to pay and allowances as per clause 10 of appointment order: pay on par with State Government employees; allowances like Dearness Allowance, Dearness Pay, Interim Relief, Additional Dearness Allowances as admissible to Central Government employees as on date of absorption (October 1976); State Government's expenditure reimbursed by Central Government till they remain in cadre of PET.

Judgment Excerpts

Condition No.9 specified that "From the date of absorption in the State Service he/she will be entitled to all allowances as admissible to other State Government employees of this Cadre." Condition No.10 stated: "The pay & allowance he/she gets under the Central Government at the time of absorption in the State Service will be protected, for this purpose the allowances to be protected are Dearness Allowance, Dearness Pay, Interim Relief and Additional Dearness Allowances." Para 15 said: "The total expenditure on pay, allowances, etc. of the N.D.S. Instructors will continue to be reimbursed by the Government of India to the State Government till they remain in the cadre of P.E.T. in which they are absorbed by the State Government." Thus, it would be clear that the respondents who were hitherto working with the Central Government are absorbed in the service of the State of Haryana in the Education Department as P.E.Ts., or D.P.Es. with effect from July 1, 1976, will be entitled to the pay on par with the State Government employees and allowances, namely, the Dearness Allowances, Interim Relief etc, will be as admissible to the Central Government employees and as on the date of absorption.

Procedural History

Respondents were appointed as Physical Training Instructors by the Central Government; on October 14, 1976, they were appointed by the State Government of Haryana in N.D.S.I. Scheme consequent upon decision to absorb N.D.S. Instructors in State Service with effect from July 1, 1976; respondents filed C.W.P. No. 2558 of 1991 before Punjab and Haryana High Court; Division Bench passed order dated August 4, 1994; State of Haryana and another filed appeal by special leave in Supreme Court; leave granted; Supreme Court disposed of appeal with clarifications.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Partition Suit Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Petitioners Claiming to be Coparceners Held Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Case Upholding High Court's Confirmation of Collector's Award. Court Rules that Claimant's Own Admission of Purchase Price and Ten-Fold Increase Obviates Consideration of Adjacent Sale Deed...