Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appellant in Railway Compensation Case Due to Incident Not Qualifying as Untoward Incident. Death Occurred While Crossing Railway Tracks, Not from Falling from Train Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, Making Compensation Ineligible Regardless of Passenger Status....

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 filed by the appellant, who was the original applicant and widow of the deceased, against the Union of India represented by the G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The court recognized and enforced five foreign arbitral awards, rejecting challenges based on invalidity of arbitration agreement and scope of submission....

The High Court of Bombay adjudicated a commercial arbitration petition filed under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking recognition and enforcement of five foreign arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief for Possession of Flats. Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion in Denying Interim Measures Under Section 17 Upheld, as No Patent Illegality or Perversity Demonstrated in Orders Dated February 14, 2019 and December 15, 2022....

The dispute originated from a Joint Development Agreement dated August 20, 2009, between the Owner (late Petitioners, represented by legal heirs) and the Developer ( Respondent ) for redevelopment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)...

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Later, the defendants asserted that the tenancy was i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Compensation Case, Reversing Tribunal's Denial Based on Untoward Incident Interpretation. Death of Passenger While Re-boarding Moving Train After Nature's Call Constitutes 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, Entitling Claimants to Compensation....

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 following the death of a passenger. The deceased, traveling with his family on a reserved ticket from Pune to Tandur, got down on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied....

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in 2015 with a 20% share after investing Rs.2,46,99,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case....

The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no. 1 during cross-examination. The original plaintif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Applications in Property Assignment and Supplemental Agreement Dispute. The court held that an unregistered supplemental agreement cannot modify a registered deed of assignment and was frustrated due to non-fulfillment of conditions, while the plaintiff's rights under the assignment were upheld....

The dispute arose between Applicant (Plaintiff) and (Defendant No.1) over a property assignment. On 20.11.2012, Defendant No.1 executed a registered Deed of Assignment and Irrevocable Power of Attorne...