High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification...
...
Karnataka High Court
Sort by:
High Court
KAHC010479002008_1...
The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDC Ltd.), Vedanta Limited, ...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act....
A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 issued by the State of Karnataka under Section 98A o...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence....
A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities including National Mineral Development Corporation Li...
- 102
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980...
The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (...
- 150
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Medical Council Enquiry Proceedings — Advocate's Right to Appear Under Section 32 of Advocates Act, 1961 Upheld. The court held that the Karnataka Medical Council had discretion to permit an advocate to appear on behalf of the respondent doctor, and the petitioner's objection was not sustainable....
The petitioner, V. Damothiran, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated May 23, 2013 and June 27, 2013 passed by the Karnataka Medical Coun...
- 107
High Court
- 111
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal with Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Delay of 2 Years Condoned on Condition of Reduced Interest. Claimant's compensation enhanced from Rs. 1,35,000 to Rs. 2,00,000 under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....
The appellant, Cheluvaraju, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 07.09.2010 passed by the I Additional Small Ca...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in TDS Dispute on License Fee — Payment for Use of Hotel Property Held as 'Rent' Under Section 194-I of Income Tax Act, 1961. License fee paid by assessee for use of hotel premises constitutes rent liable for TDS, and failure to deduct attracts consequences under Section 201....
The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 27.2.2009. The dispute pertained to the asse...
- 125
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Contractual Liability Under Section 147(1) Proviso (ii) Not Applicable to Third-Party Claims. Insurer Held Jointly and Severally Liable with Owner and Lessee for Compensation Awarded to Injured Claimant....
The appeal was filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Bangalore, in MVC No.2964/2010, dated 19.10.2011. The Tribunal had aw...
- 65
