High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Contractual Liability Under Section 147(1) Proviso (ii) Not Applicable to Third-Party Claims. Insurer Held Jointly and Severally Liable with Owner and Lessee for Compensation Awarded to Injured Claimant.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Bangalore, in MVC No.2964/2010, dated 19.10.2011. The Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs.2,11,350/- with interest at 6% per annum on Rs.2,01,350/- (excluding future medical expenses) from the date of petition till payment, making the appellant-insurer, the owner of the bus, and the lessee (BMTC) jointly and severally liable. The claimant, Srinivasa Babu Reddy, was injured on 30.03.2007 when he was hit from behind by a bus while riding his motorcycle. The sole contention raised by the insurer was that its liability was 'contractual' and therefore excluded under proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court rejected this argument, holding that the proviso excludes only liability arising under a contract of employment, not third-party liability. The court noted that the insurer's liability to third parties is statutory and must be covered under the policy. The appeal was dismissed, and the award of the Tribunal was confirmed.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Insurance - Third-Party Liability - Section 147(1) proviso (ii) - Contractual Liability - The insurer contended that its liability was contractual and thus excluded under proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that the proviso excludes only liability arising under a 'contract of employment' and not third-party liability. The insurer is liable to indemnify the owner/lessee for compensation awarded to a third-party claimant injured in a motor accident. (Paras 1-4)

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Insurance - Joint and Several Liability - Section 147 - The Tribunal had made the insurer, owner, and lessee jointly and severally liable for compensation. The High Court upheld this, holding that the insurer's liability to third parties is statutory and not merely contractual, and the proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) does not apply to third-party claims. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the liability of the insurer under a motor vehicle insurance policy is a 'contractual liability' excluded by proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, thereby absolving the insurer from indemnifying the owner/lessee in respect of third-party claims.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The judgment and award of the Tribunal dated 19.10.2011 in MVC No.2964/2010 is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Contractual liability
  • Third-party liability
  • Section 147(1) proviso (ii) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Joint and several liability
  • Insurer's liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (12) 4

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.7518/2012 (MV)

2015-12-02

H.G.Ramesh

Sri R.Jaiprakash (for appellant), Sri P.N.Hegde (for R-1), Sri K.Nagaraja (for R-2), R-3 served

New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Sri Srinivasa Babu Reddy @ Srinivasa, BMTC, Sri K.T.Rajashekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by insurer against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Insurer sought to avoid liability on ground of contractual liability exclusion

Filing Reason

Insurer challenged the Tribunal's award making it jointly and severally liable for compensation

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs.2,11,350/- with interest at 6% p.a. on Rs.2,01,350/- in MVC No.2964/2010 dated 19.10.2011

Issues

Whether the insurer's liability is contractual and excluded under proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurer): The liability is contractual and not required to be covered in law in view of proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 excludes only liability arising under a contract of employment, not third-party liability. The insurer's liability to third parties is statutory and must be covered under the policy. Hence, the insurer is jointly and severally liable with the owner and lessee for compensation awarded to a third-party claimant.

Judgment Excerpts

The sole contention urged by learned Counsel for the appellant is that the liability saddled on the appellant is a ‘contractual liability’ and hence, is not required to be covered in law in view of proviso (ii) to Section 147(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘the Act’). Section 147(1) proviso (ii) of the Act excludes only liability arising under a contract of employment. It does not exclude third-party liability. The insurer is liable to indemnify the owner/lessee in respect of third-party claims.

Procedural History

The claimant filed MVC No.2964/2010 before the XVI Additional Judge, MACT, Bangalore, which awarded compensation on 19.10.2011. The insurer appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 147(1), 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Contractual Liability Under Section 147(1) Proviso (ii) Not Applicable to Third-Party Claims. Insurer Held Jointly and Severally Liable with Owner and Lessee for Compensat...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Addresses Multiple Writ Petitions by Complainants Against Respondent Company. Labour Dispute Allegedly Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, After Labour Court Orders.