Karnataka High Court

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste C...
Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Impose...

Karnataka High Court

Home Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Motor Vehicles for Tax Arrears — Held That Procedure Under Section 8 of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Must Be Followed Before Detention. The court quashed the seizure of vehicles by the respondents for non-compliance with mandatory notice and hearing requirements under Section 8 of the Act....

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the seizure and detention of motor vehicles by the respondents (State of Karnata...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority....

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and the Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013....

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act....

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karnataka, Mysore Urban Development Authority, Bangalor...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1...

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Appear or Argue. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff and defendant Nos.2-4 are entitled to 1/4th share each in joint family properties under Hindu Succession Act, 1956....

The appellant, a defendant in a partition suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the preliminary decree dated 2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report and Disciplinary Proceedings Against BWSSB Engineer for Unauthorised Construction Allegation — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice....

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Ramesh, an Assistant Executive Engineer with the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused Postman in Criminal Revision for Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust — Benefit of Doubt Given Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Entrustment. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove entrustment of the demand draft beyond reasonable doubt, leading to acquittal under Sections 406, 408, 465, 511, 120B IPC....

The petitioner, H.N. Ramachandra, was the first accused in a criminal case (C.C.542/99) before the IV Additional CMM, Bangalore, along with three other accused, all postmen. The prosecution alleged th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Puttaiah @ Mahesh, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for rash and negligent ...

Previous Next

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)