Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Judgment on Admissions in Admiralty Suit. Plaintiff Seeks Relief Under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Alleging Admissions by Defendants....

The present matter concerns an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Raj Transport and Trading Company, in the pending Admiralty Suit No. 17 of 2015 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC — Conviction Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(f) Challenged...

This appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. The incident occurred on 26th Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered Interim Relief in Arbitration Petitions Over Access to Common Amenities at Lodha World Towers. Dispute Over FCAM Charges and Contractual Escalation Clauses Led to Analysis Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The judgment concerns a batch of petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by high networth individuals who purchased apartments at Lodha World Towers, Worli, deve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034....

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.18995 OF 2024...

The litigation arose from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the implementation of a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) on land bearing Survey No.502/A (part)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds School Authorities Not Liable Under Section 21(2) POCSO for Failure to Report Alleged POCSO Offence; Findings Based on Prompt Facilitation of CCTV Footage and Absence of Intentional Suppression. The Court Ruled That Duty to Report Under Section 21(2) Arises Only After Verification and That Continuing Proceedings Would Be Abuse of Process....

The litigation arose from a criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash FIR No.542 of 2024 dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking MD Medicine Admission Under In-Service Quota Due to Failure to Challenge Cut-off Date and Concealment of Diploma. Petitioner’s Non-disclosure of Postgraduate Diploma and Non-challenge to Cut-off Date as per Supreme Court Directions Rendered the Petition Unworthy of Relief....

The petitioner, a medical officer serving in rural hospitals, challenged the PG medical admission process for the in-service category for academic year 2023-24. He alleged that respondent no. 6 had ob...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Trust Status. Tribunal's Finding that Private Specific Trust Constituted Association of Persons Upheld, Resulting in Disallowance of Interest Paid to Beneficiaries under Section 40(ba) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The appeal arose from an assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2001-2002 concerning the status of a Private Specific Trust, Mehta Jaising Construction. The trust was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Income Tax Appeal on Status of Private Trust as Association of Persons and Disallowance of Interest Under Section 40(b). The question of law was whether the Tribunal correctly held the trust as an AOP and disallowed interest of Rs.9,40,686/- paid to beneficiaries under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

This income tax appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was filed by Mehta Jaising Construction (the assessee) challenging the determination of its status as an Association of Persons (A...