Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Application for Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The application pertained to a dispute arising from an agreement with an arbitration clause where the parties failed to agree on the appointment of an arbitrator.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-07-27 12:18:27
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 36

Arbitration Application No. 35 of 2025

2025-06-18

Somashekhar Sundaresan, J.

For Applicant: Mr. Rahul Totala a/w Chaitanya Mendon, Mitesh Jain i/b Swapnil Lohiya; For Respondent: Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande a/w Paras Parekh, Abhineet Sharma & Kandarp Trivedi i/b RHP Partners

Samruddhi Industries Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Mr Ramakant Narayan Malu

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Arbitration application for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Appointment of arbitrator by the court

Filing Reason

Dispute between parties with arbitration agreement, unable to agree on arbitrator

Judgment Excerpts

This Application has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act...

Procedural History

Application filed, heard and reserved on April 15, 2025, and pronounced on June 18, 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
arbitration appointment of arbitrator Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. The court held that the sale instance dated 20.4.1988, just two months before the... 2026-07-27 12:18:28
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. 2026-07-27 12:18:27
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt limitation Circumstantial Evidence Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?