Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Temple Land Encroachment Case — Non-consideration by Statutory Authority Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, V. Chinnaiya, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the fourth res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Statutory Authority to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Road. Non-Consideration of Representation Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, S. Mariyappan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the first and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Land Encroachment Eviction Order, Directs Petitioner to Avail Statutory Appeal Under Section 10 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Court grants interim protection from coercive action pending appeal....

The petitioner, Dhanalakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, challenging an order dated 11.12.2024 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Government to Consider Representation for Notification of Village for 'Vada Manju Virattu' Event. The court held that non-consideration of a representation by a statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Alex, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a Mandamus to direct the first respondent, the Secr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, N.G. Seenivasan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the third ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation Against Laying of State Highway in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, V. Asokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from laying a State Highway connecting Kodaikanal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Government Poramboke Land. Writ of Mandamus Issued for Consideration of Representation Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, B. Kannan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the District Coll...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Building Encroaching on Road Extension. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting mandamus under Article 226....

The petitioner, S. Anbalagan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Patta Rejection for Violation of Natural Justice — Directs Reconsideration After Hearing. Tahsildar's Rejection of Patta Application Without Notice or Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Disposal....

The petitioners, R.Essakimuthu, D.Vanaraja, and D.Bharathiraja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Mandamus to Reinstate Cancelled Patta — Suo Moto Cancellation by Village Administrative Officer Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider the petitioner's representation and reinstate patta No.988 after hearing all parties....

The petitioner, Srinivasan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the third respon...