High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitioners in Food Safety and Standards Act Case Seeking Quashing of FIR for Alleged Expired Food Product Re-labelling. The Court considered whether the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, being a complete code, bars police registration of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.185 of 2026 and the complaint dated 21-04-2026 registered by Avalahalli Police Station, Bengaluru Rural. The first petitioner, Earth Recycler Private Limited, represented by its authorized signatory, along with two directors, sought quashing of proceedings for offences under Sections 23, 24 and 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Sections 316(2), 318(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural. The company was engaged in collection and disposal of expired food products, damaged consumer goods and other waste materials. The complainant alleged that the petitioners collected expired food products and damaged goods and indulged in re-labelling, re-packing and resale of those products to the general public. A complaint from a resident led to registration of the crime. The prosecution contended that a spot mahazar conducted on 22-04-2026 recovered milk, curd, fruits, vegetables, eggs, wheat flour, cool drinks, ready-mix products, washing powder and shampoo, indicating a wide-scale activity. The petitioners argued that the Food Safety and Standards Act is a complete code providing for inspection, sample collection, analysis and prosecution, and that police lack jurisdiction to register an FIR under BNS without a preliminary enquiry and notice. They relied on Sushil Kumar Gupta v. State of West Bengal. The State argued that distinct BNS offences are alleged and investigation is at a nascent stage, and the special enactment cannot be a charter of immunity. The court noted that the company secured a licence on 05-07-2025 valid up to 04-07-2026 from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, and that a tax invoice showed purchase and sale of expired damaged oil to a soap factory. The available excerpt records these facts and submissions but ends before the court's analysis and final order. Therefore, the final decision and ratio decidendi are not mentioned in the provided text.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Whether FIR for offences under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 can be quashed on the ground that the special Act is a complete code - Petitioners contended that police registration without preliminary enquiry under the Act is mechanical and without jurisdiction; State argued that investigation into distinct BNS offences is permissible at nascent stage - Held, the available excerpt records only submissions and preliminary observations and does not contain the final decision (Paras 1-6).

B) Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Offences and Procedure - Sections 23, 24, 59, 41, 42, 47 - Whether Act is complete code and mandates preliminary enquiry before police action - Petitioners relied on Sushil Kumar Gupta v. State of West Bengal and argued that police cannot interfere and must follow statutory mechanism for inspection, sampling, analysis and prosecution; State contended that allegations of relabelling expired products and wide recovery justify investigation - Held, not determined in available excerpt (Paras 4-6, 8).

C) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Substantive Offences - Sections 316(2), 318(4) r/w 3(5) - Applicability alongside Food Safety Act - State argued that relabelling expired milk, curd, fruits, vegetables, eggs, wheat flour, cool drinks, ready-mix products, washing powder and shampoo and releasing them into commerce constitutes distinct BNS offences requiring police investigation - Held, not determined in available excerpt (Paras 1, 5-5.1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the registration of FIR under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for offences also covered by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 is barred because the Act is a complete code; and whether police investigation is without jurisdiction when mandatory preliminary enquiry under the Act was not conducted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Not mentioned - the available judgment excerpt ends before the final order; the petition was heard and reserved for orders and pronounced on 14-08-2026 but the operative decision is not included.

Law Points

  • Food Safety and Standards Act as complete code
  • police jurisdiction
  • preliminary enquiry
  • Sections 41
  • 42
  • 47 procedure
  • distinct BNS offences
  • re-labelling of expired products constitutes public health risk
  • special enactment not immunity from BNS investigation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (08) 14

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9114 OF 2026

2026-08-14

M. Nagaprasanna

B.S. Sachin, B.N. Jagadeesha

Earth Recycler Pvt. Ltd., represented by its authorized signatory Mr. Aamir Ahmed Chuna; Mohamamed Dawood S.; Abdul Kadhir Kalathoor

State of Karnataka by Avalahalli P.S., Whitefield Sub Division Bengaluru City; Sri Anil Kumar B.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition seeking quashing of FIR and complaint for alleged offences under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of FIR in Crime No.185 of 2026 and complaint dated 21-04-2026 and all further proceedings pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural.

Filing Reason

FIR registered alleging that petitioners collected expired food products and damaged goods and re-labelled, re-packed and resold them to the general public; police also sealed premises; petitioners alleged mechanical registration without preliminary enquiry under the Act.

Issues

Whether the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 being a complete code bars registration of FIR under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the same allegations Whether police have jurisdiction to investigate offences under BNS when special Act procedures are alleged to be violated Whether registration of crime without preliminary enquiry/notice under the Act is invalid Whether allegations of re-labelling expired food products warrant investigation despite the Act's regulatory mechanism

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Act is a complete code, company engaged in lawful recycling, preliminary enquiry mandatory, police mechanically registered FIR without jurisdiction, police sealed premises, reliance on Sushil Kumar Gupta v. State of West Bengal State argued that allegations are serious, mahazar inventory shows wide-scale re-labelling of expired products including milk, curd, fruits, vegetables, eggs, wheat flour, cool drinks, ready-mix products, washing powder and shampoo, investigation at nascent stage, Act not immunity for distinct BNS offences

Ratio Decidendi

Not mentioned - the excerpt does not contain the court's final reasoning or ratio decidendi.

Judgment Excerpts

The company of the petitioners viz., M/s Earth Recycler Private Limited (‘the Company’ for short) is engaged in collection and disposal of expired food products, damaged consumer goods and other waste materials. The Act is a complete Code on to itself, which provides a complete mechanism for inspection, collection of samples, analysis and prosecution. The inventory, he would submit, is itself telling. It includes milk, curd, fruits, vegetables, eggs, wheat flour, cool drinks, ready-mix products and, beyond food articles, washing powder and shampoo... The afore-narrated business of the petitioners is not in dispute. The Company secures a licence on 05-07-2025, which is valid upto 04-07-2026, from the Government of Karnataka, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.

Procedural History

Complaint dated 21-04-2026 registered by Avalahalli Police Station as Crime No.185 of 2026 under Sections 23, 24, 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Sections 316(2), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of BNS 2023. Petitioners filed Criminal Petition No.9114 of 2026 under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing. Spot mahazar conducted on 22-04-2026. Petition heard and reserved for orders on 05-08-2026; order pronounced on 14-08-2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: Sections 23, 24, 59, 41, 42, 47
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Sections 316(2), 318(4), 3(5)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Section 528
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Dying Declaration Recorded Without Doctor's Fitness Certificate and While Deceased on Ventilator Cannot Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Maintainability of Article 32 Petitions Challenging Madras Marumakkathayam (Removal of Doubts) Act, 1955; Preliminary Objections Rejected. Legislative Declaration That Certain Sthanam Properties Are Tarwad Properties Automatical...