Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Land Acquisition Matter - Petitioner's Grievance Over Acquisition of Land for National Highway Project. Court Orders Second Respondent to Decide Representation Within Eight Weeks Due to Inaction Despite Superior's Direction....

The petitioner, M.Shanmugasundaram, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Statutory Authority to Consider Representation Against Unauthorized Construction — Non-Consideration of Representation Amounts to Dereliction of Duty. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Tirunelveli Corporation to Decide Fresh Representation Within Eight Weeks Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, V.S.T. Amanullah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents (Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Consider Representation for Building Regularization — Duty of Statutory Authority to Decide Representations Within Stipulated Time. Non-consideration of representation under Article 226 of Constitution of India amounts to dereliction of duty, and court directs consideration within three months....

The petitioner, K.S. Shahul Hameed, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Government Permission for Ford India Plant Closure, Dismisses Workers' Challenge. Closure Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Valid as Government Considered All Relevant Factors and Provided Compensation....

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by 59 workers of Ford India Private Limited challenging the Government Order G.O.Ms.No.171 dated 28.12.2022, which granted permission to close down th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Delay Condonation Petitions as Withdrawn, Resulting in Rejection of Writ Appeals at SR Stage. Petitioner Sought to Withdraw Miscellaneous Petitions Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, Leading to Dismissal of Appeals Without Adjudication on Merits....

The petitioner, N.V. Rangaraju, filed two miscellaneous petitions under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 243-day delay in filing writ appeals against an order dated 04.06.2019 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Declared Void Due to Fraudulent Impersonation. Court holds that when a plaintiff specifically pleads and proves that a sale deed was executed by impersonation, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove the genuineness of the document under Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872....

The plaintiff, A. Kathija Bi, filed a suit seeking declaration that a sale deed dated 24.03.2003 executed in favor of the defendant, V. Nagarajan, was null and void, and for recovery of possession of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Lack of Public Disorder and Proximity. Detenu Ordered to be Released as Ground Case Under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Could Be Dealt Under Ordinary Law, Not Requiring Preventive Detention Under Act 14 of 1982....

The petitioner, Valliyamma, wife of Thirumalai alias Karuvadu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. The court held that a delay of over one month between arrest and detention order without explanation renders the detention order invalid under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Rajasekar, father of the detenu Balasakthi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention order p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained....

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention order passed by...