Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation Against Fireworks Factory License in Writ of Mandamus — Non-Consideration by Statutory Authority Amounts to Dereliction of Duty. Court orders second respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 02.12.2024 within three months, without expressing views on merits....

The petitioner, S. Rajaram, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Shifting TASMAC Liquor Shop from Temple Land. Court orders District Collector to decide on representation within three months without expressing views on merits....

The petitioner, S. Kodieswaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Encroachment Case — Statutory Authority Must Act on Representation Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, S. Mani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the District Collector, Tahsildar, and Village Administrative Officer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Scrutiny Committee to Consider Appeal for Scheduled Tribe Certificate Within 45 Days. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Kumaresan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Tamil Nadu St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Alleged Land Encroachment Within Three Months. Duty of Statutory Authority to Consider Representation Under Article 226 of Constitution of India and Land Encroachment Act....

The petitioner, Baratha Muthu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the fourth re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Removal of Encroachment on Government Poromboke Land. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to consider representation within eight weeks....

The petitioner, Athimoolam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegation in Sathanur Village. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Palanivelu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs NHAI to Consider Representation for Subway Construction Near School. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, A. Palanivel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondents, including the National Highways Authority of India and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in SARFAESI Act Challenge — Petitioner Granted Liberty to Approach Debts Recovery Tribunal. Writ petition under Article 226 challenging Section 14 order under SARFAESI Act withdrawn; court permits withdrawal without costs....

The petitioner, B. Arikaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, challenging an order passed in Crl.M.P.No.3226 of 2024 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Road Encroachment — Mandamus Issued for Removal of Alleged Encroachment on Cart Track. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation Within Three Months; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, N.S. Krishnamaraja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Dist...