High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Set Aside Patent Application Rejection Due to Procedural Lapses and Non-Consideration of Material Evidence. Detailed Scrutiny Ordered for Patent Application with Direction for Reassignment to a Different Officer....

a) Breach of natural justice due to lack of notice on critical objections. b) Misappreciation of documentary evidence, including the Deed of Assignment. c) The court upheld the right to withdraw pre-g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Set Aside Order of Revisional Authority in Membership Eligibility Dispute. Enrollment of Members Without Fulfilling Statutory Conditions—Interference by Revisional Authority Quashed—Findings of Registrar and Appellate Authority Upheld...

a) Registrar’s powers under Section 11 of the MCS Act are confined to determining the factual eligibility of prospective members. b) Revisional Authority’s intervention unwarranted—No jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Application, Holds Limitation and Due Diligence as Key Issues in Share Recovery Suit. Summary Judgment Denied in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Need for Oral Evidence...

Summary Judgment under Order XIII-A of the CPC: The Court held that a summary judgment can only be granted if the Defendant has no real prospect of defending the claim and there is no compelling reas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquisition Proceedings Declared Lapsed. Non-payment of Compensation and Non-possession of Acquired Land for Over Five Years Resulted in Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013....

Mere mutation entries without kabjepatti or credible evidence of possession do not establish the taking over of physical possession. Absence of notice under Section 12(2) and failure to offer or tende...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed...

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsibilities, rather than designation, determines the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 — Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings...

Jurisdictional Error — Absence of Fresh Tangible Material — Change of Opinion — Issue Pending Before Tribunal — Reassessment Proceedings Held Without Jurisdiction Reassessment proceedings can...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Nagpur Municipal Corporation’s Pay Scale Fixation Upheld — Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees’ Claim for Higher Grade Pay...

Employees’ Demand for Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- Rejected — Court Rules Rs.2400/- Grade Pay Justified Based on Absorbed Posts and Promotion Structure The Court held that the petitioners failed to est...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award Due to Violation of Natural Justice Principles. Opportunity of Personal Hearing Not Provided – Award Set Aside with Directions for Fresh Hearing and Decision...

Constitution of India, Article 300-A – Right to Property – No Person Shall Be Deprived of His Property Save by Authority of Law – Principles of Natural Justice Violated – Failure to Provide Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes District Court Judgment, Restores Arbitration Challenge for Fresh Consideration on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Failure to Address Key Contentions. Arbitration Award Set Aside for Reconsideration Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

Scope of Section 34: The Court held that while the scope of interference under Section 34 is limited, the District Judge must consider specific challenges raised by the parties and provide reasons f...