Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Regularization of Contractual Employee in Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan — No Right to Absorption for Project-Based Appointments. Contractual appointment under a time-bound scheme does not confer any right to regularization or permanent employment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jayshree Kolhare, was appointed on a contract basis as a Data Entry Operator under the District Primary Education Program (DPEP) by the Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The DPEP was a centrally sponsored scheme launched in 1994, which later merged into Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in 2003. The petitioner sought directions to absorb or regularize her services, relying on instances where similarly situated employees were accommodated and on case laws directing regularization. The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the appointment was purely contractual and project-based, with no sanctioned posts. The court, after hearing the parties, dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner had no right to regularization or absorption. The court emphasized that contractual appointments under time-bound schemes do not create a right to permanent employment, and that regularization can only be done in accordance with statutory rules and against sanctioned posts. The court also noted that the petitioner had accepted the contractual terms and could not claim a vested right to continue beyond the project period.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization - Contractual Appointment - No Right to Absorption - Petitioner appointed on contract basis under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, a time-bound project, sought regularization - Court held that there is no right to regularization or absorption in the absence of sanctioned posts and statutory rules - Held that project-based appointments do not confer any right to permanent employment (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a contractual employee appointed under a time-bound project (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan) is entitled to regularization or absorption in government service.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. No direction for regularization or absorption of the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Regularization of contractual employees
  • No right to absorption
  • Project-based appointments
  • Distinction between regular and contractual employment
  • Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 159

Writ Petition No.4723 of 2018

2026-07-14

Kishore C. Sant, Ajit B. Kadethankar

Mr. B. V. Thombre (Petitioner), Mrs. S. S. Joshi (State), Mr. R. D. Sanap (Respondent No.1), Dr. Supriya Pansambal (Respondent No.6), Mr. S. R. Dhepale (Respondent Nos.8 and 9)

Jayshree d/o Ramlal Kolhare

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking directions to absorb or regularize services of a contractual employee appointed under a time-bound project.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought directions to absorb or regularize her services as Data Entry Operator.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was appointed on contract basis under DPEP/Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and sought regularization after the scheme ended.

Issues

Whether a contractual employee appointed under a time-bound project is entitled to regularization or absorption in government service.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that similarly situated employees were accommodated and relied on case laws directing regularization. Respondents argued that the appointment was purely contractual and project-based, with no sanctioned posts, and no right to regularization.

Ratio Decidendi

Contractual appointments under time-bound projects do not confer any right to regularization or absorption in the absence of sanctioned posts and statutory rules. Project-based employees cannot claim permanent employment.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner, who was appointed on contract basis by the Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad as Data Entry Operator under the District Primary Education Program, seeks directions to absorb her or to regularize her services.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Allowing Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Appeal. Dispute Regarding Apportionment of Compensation Must be Adjudicated Under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Not Through Impleadmen...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to TADA Convicts Despite Past Overstay, Emphasizes Reformative Purpose of Prison Leave. Furlough is a right of a convict and cannot be denied solely on ground of previous late surrender without considering overall co...