High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Review Applications in Service Dispute Over Work Assistants in Puducherry Public Works Department. The Court Examines Whether the Central Administrative Tribunal's Order on Work Assistants' Claims Suffers from Error Apparent on the Face of the Record Warranting Review.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard two review applications, REV.APLW Nos. 106 and 105 of 2026, involving service law disputes. The petitioners, who include Work Assistants and an association from the Puducherry Public Works Department, sought review of an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The respondents include the Union of India represented by the Government of Puducherry, the Chief Engineer and Chief Secretary of the department, and other officials. The court, comprising Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice N. Senthilkumar, delivered its judgment on July 14, 2026. The available text does not include the factual background, legal issues, arguments, or the court's decision. No further details can be extracted from the provided excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

REV.APLW No. 106 of 2026

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 49

REV.APLW No. 106 of 2026 and REV.APLW No. 105 of 2026

2026-07-14

S. M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2808

V.Balasundaram, T.Marane Parthibane, G.Krishnamuthy, V.Sundara Rajan, Bassava Balasubramaniam, R. Malaroli, K.Lalitha, K.Ilango, R. Malathy, S.Lakshmanan, R.Sakkaravarthy, P.Ashok Kumar, K. Gunaseelan, .Chandrasekar, R.Ramesh, P. Balasubrmanian, K.Sekar

Union Of India Rep by the Government of Puducherry through Secretary, Public Works Department; The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department; The Chief Secretary to Government; Puducherry State Public Works Dept. Work Asst. Association rep by Secretary Er.Shunmougam; P.Elango Arasan; The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Expired Fitness Certificate and Permit. The court held that absence of fitness certificate and permit does not absolve insurer of liability to third part...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in BDA Allotment Dispute — Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Non-Registration of Agreement. Single Judge's Order Quashing Allotment Set Aside as Allottee Had Paid Full Consideration and Possession Was Deliv...