Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credibl...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's De...

HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal

Admin

2026-10-12 03:13:58

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

S.A. NO.162 OF 2006

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 52

S.A. No.162 of 2006

2026-07-14

R. Sakthivel

2026:MHC:2798

Ms. V. Ambika

Ramani Ammal (Died), K. Mohan, A. Baskaran (Legal Representative of deceased 1st Appellant)

Munisamy Naicker (Died), Muniammal, Rajendran, Vijaya, Minor Jaya (represented by mother Muniammal), Agilandam, Suceela (Died), A. Baskar

Procedural History

The suit O.S. No.414 of 1994 was filed before the Additional Munsif Court, Kancheepuram, which decreed the suit on 25.02.1998. Against that, an appeal A.S. No.72 of 1998 was filed before the Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram, which confirmed the trial court decree on 19.10.2004. Thereafter, the defendants filed the present Second Appeal S.A. No.162 of 2006 under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. During pendency, some parties died and legal representatives were brought on record.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 100

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employer in ESI Act Bar on Tort Claims for Employment Injury. Section 53 of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Prevents Employee from Claiming Damages Under Tort After Receiving Disablement Benefit for Hand Amputation in Facto... 2026-11-04 08:36:36

High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Application in SEBI Investigation Case — Applicant Failed to Show Prima Facie Case of No Offence Under SEBI Act and IPC. Court Held That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted Where Investigation Is at Nas... 2026-11-04 08:36:29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Police Officer in Preventive Detention Case...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process...

Supreme Court Allows Recruitment Appeal in Police Constable Case Due to Flawed Medical Ass...