High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workmen's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award Rejecting Wage Enhancement Claim. Court upholds Tribunal's finding that Memorandum of Settlement dated 29 April 2008 was not binding on employer as workmen failed to establish employer's membership in signatory association....

The petitioners, three workmen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an Award dated 28 August 2019 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment....

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-2017 on 28 November 2016 declaring a total in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case — Force Majeure Clause Cannot Override Statutory Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act. Promoter Liable to Pay Interest for Delayed Possession Even if Delay Due to Events Beyond Control....

The case involves an appeal filed by Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (the promoter/developer) under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act) challenging the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Adjacent Landowner in RERA Case — Locus Standi of Non-Allottee Denied. Project Completed Prior to RERA Act Not Required to Be Registered Under Section 3 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016....

The appellant, Dr. Yogesh Keshav Bele, owned land adjacent to a project called 'Blue Heaven' developed by Respondent No. 3. He was not an allottee in that project. On 23 August 2017, he lodged a writt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Case. Appellate Tribunal's Suo Motu Adjudication on Termination of Agreement Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction....

The case involves an appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act) filed by Satyam Developers, the promoter of a project called 'Swaroop Harmony' in Sant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Chandrakant Baburao Musane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for the murder of his father-in-law under Sections 302, 498-A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property....

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family property. The trial court passed a preliminary decr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title....

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The appellants (defendants) claimed that they had been in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence After Plaintiff's Side Closed. Court Held That Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence or to Remedy Negligence of Party....

The petitioner, Sri P. Ramaprasad, was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 231/2019 pending before the XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City. He filed a suit for permanent injunction agai...