Judgements without assigned author

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance of public order....

The petitioner, Alfaj @Altaf @Kaliyo Satarbhai Shaikh, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 26.12.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Bhavnagar, under the Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material to Show Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 as 'cruel person' set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Mohammad Saddam Mohammadaasif Kureshi, was preventively detained by an order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Soci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Bootlegger Case for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs under the Prohibition Act does not establish disturbance to public order....

The petitioner, Paresh @ Pariyoprabhatbhai Solanki, was preventively detained by an order dated 24.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara City, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View and Inconsistent Evidence. Casteist Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Compound, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989....

The case arises from an incident on 02.11.2001 at about 10:00 hrs, where the appellants, employees of Mangrol Nagarpalika, allegedly broke a motor stand and cut the water connection of the complainant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income Determined as Last Drawn Salary Instead of Average. Court held that the Tribunal erred in averaging salary slips and should have considered the last salary of Rs. 16,456/- for computing loss of dependency under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellants, original claimants, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Age Discrepancy — Multiplier Applied Based on Aadhar Card Age of 55 Years Instead of Postmortem Age of 65 Years. Notional Income of Deceased Housewife Increased from Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 4,000 per Month Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 07.11.2023 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Banaskantha, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.129 of 2019. The appellants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148A(d) of Income Tax Act for Mechanical Disposal Without Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Assessee's Detailed Response Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Rendering Subsequent Section 148 Notice Invalid....

The petitioner, Laxmi Infra Developers Limited, challenged a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 24.03.2022, proposing reassessment for Assessment Year 2018-19, and the sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Continuity and 50% Backwages for Watchman Terminated Orally. Workman Completed 240 Days of Service in Preceding Year, Attracting Protection Under Section 25(F) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Making Termination Illegal....

The present petition was filed by the State of Gujarat and another (petitioners) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, challenging the aw...