High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income Determined as Last Drawn Salary Instead of Average. Court held that the Tribunal erred in averaging salary slips and should have considered the last salary of Rs. 16,456/- for computing loss of dependency under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, original claimants, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Bhuj - Kutch, in MAC Petition No. 578 of 2021. The claim arose from a fatal accident on 09.07.2021, when the deceased Hasmukh @ Hasmukhnath Dharamnath Gunsai was riding a motorcycle bearing Reg. No. GJ-12-DL 1780 and was hit by a Bolero bearing Reg. No. GJ-03-BR-7808 driven rashly and negligently, resulting in his death. The claimants sought compensation. The Tribunal partly allowed the claim, but the claimants appealed contending that the Tribunal erred in computing the deceased's income by taking an average of his salary slips (Rs. 15,000/-) instead of considering his last drawn salary of Rs. 16,456/-. The High Court heard learned Advocate Mr. N. A. Bhalodi for the appellants and learned Advocate Ms. E. Shailaja for the respondent Insurance Company. The court found that the Tribunal's approach was erroneous as there was no evidence of reduction in income, and the last salary should have been taken. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's award on income, and directed recomputation of compensation based on the last salary of Rs. 16,456/-. The Insurance Company was directed to pay the enhanced amount with interest.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Computation of Income - Last Drawn Salary - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 - The Tribunal had taken an average of the deceased's salary slips to arrive at an income of Rs. 15,000/-, whereas the last drawn salary was Rs. 16,456/-. The High Court held that the Tribunal ought to have considered the last salary before the date of accident, as there was no evidence of reduction in income. The appeal was allowed and compensation enhanced accordingly. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in taking the average of the deceased's salary instead of considering the last drawn salary for computing compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and award of the Tribunal dated 13.09.2024 is set aside to the extent of income determination. The income of the deceased is taken as Rs. 16,456/- per month. The Tribunal is directed to recompute the compensation accordingly and pay the enhanced amount with interest at the rate fixed by the Tribunal.

Law Points

  • Income determination for loss of dependency
  • Last drawn salary vs average salary
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 Section 173
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 365

R/First Appeal No. 1163 of 2025

2026-02-19

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Nishit A Bhalodi, Ms. E. Shailaja

Minor Samir Hasmukhnath Gunsai & Anr.

Bharatkumar Rameshbhai Bambhaniya & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation by considering the deceased's last drawn salary instead of average salary.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal took an average of salary slips to determine income at Rs. 15,000/- instead of the last salary of Rs. 16,456/-.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Bhuj - Kutch partly allowed MAC Petition No. 578 of 2021 on 13.09.2024.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in taking the average of the deceased's salary instead of the last drawn salary for computing compensation.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned Advocate for the appellants submitted that the Tribunal ought to have considered the last salary before the date of accident i.e. Rs. 16,456/- instead of taking an average of Rs. 15,000/-.

Ratio Decidendi

In computing loss of dependency, the last drawn salary of the deceased should be considered unless there is evidence of reduction in income; averaging salary slips without justification is erroneous.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Advocate for the appellants – claimants has submitted that the learned Tribunal has committed error in considering the income of the deceased only Rs.15,000/- by taking the average of the salary and the Tribunal ought to have consider last salary before the date of accident i.e. 16,456/-.

Procedural History

The appellants filed MAC Petition No. 578 of 2021 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Bhuj - Kutch, which was partly allowed on 13.09.2024. Aggrieved, the appellants preferred the present First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income Determined as Last Drawn Salary Instead of Average. Court held that the Tribunal erred in averaging salary slips and should have considered the last salary of Rs. 16,45...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that once the cheque and signature are admitted, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt...