Search Results for "vice-chancellor appointment"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows PILs Challenging Vice-Chancellor Appointment Due to Flawed Qualification Assessment. Search Committee's Non-Application of Mind to Essential Qualifications under Statutory Order Issued under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Vitiated Selection.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai, which was assailed through three public interest litigation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses PILs and Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Court Holds That UGC Regulations 2010 Not Adopted by University, and Search Committee and Chancellor’s Decision Not Vitiated by Illegality or Mala Fides.

The litigation arose out of three petitions—two public interest litigations and one writ petition—challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Vice-Chancellor Appointment Under UGC Regulations and Maharashtra Universities Act. Challenge Focuses on Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 and Discretion of Chancellor in Selecting Vice-Chancellor.

The petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor of Pune University; Holds No Violation of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Finds that Petitioner Failed to Prove That Incumbent Lacked Essential Qualifications Under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare challenging the appointment of Respondent No.4, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears and Disposes of Challenge to Withdrawal of Lecturer Approval by Vice Chancellor. The Writ Petition Raises Key Questions on the Authority of University Officials Over Appointments in Affiliated Colleges.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the withdrawal of approval of the petitioner's appointmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in University Appointment Case Due to Non-Binding UGC Regulations. Appointment of Vice Chancellor Upheld as Sardar Patel University Act, 1955 Does Not Prescribe Qualifications and State Has Not Adopted UGC Regulations Through Legislation.

The dispute involved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor of Sardar ...