Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Vice-Chancellor Appointment Under UGC Regulations and Maharashtra Universities Act. Challenge Focuses on Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 and Discretion of Chancellor in Selecting Vice-Chancellor.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai by the Chancellor on 7 July 2010. The post had fallen vacant on 28 September 2009, and an earlier Search Committee was dissolved after a legal challenge. A new Search Committee was constituted on 20 March 2010. After advertisements, 98 applications were received, and 20 candidates were shortlisted for presentations. The Committee recommended five names in alphabetical order, including Dr. Welukar. The Chancellor interacted with each recommendee on 7 July 2010 and selected Dr. Welukar, noting his suitability based on academic qualification, experience, and administrative skills. The petitioners, including a candidate who had applied, alleged that Dr. Welukar lacked the essential qualification of ten years' experience as a Professor or equivalent as required by UGC Regulation 7.3.0(i). They argued the Search Committee's composition was flawed and the Chancellor's decision was arbitrary. The respondents countered that the UGC Regulations were notified on 30 June 2010, after the process began, and were not retrospective; that the UGC Act does not cover appointments of Vice-Chancellors; and that Dr. Welukar's post as Director of SIMSREE qualifies as an equivalent position. The Court examined these contentions but the provided text ends before the final decision.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of University of Mumbai was valid, particularly in view of the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2010, and the process followed by the Search Committee and Chancellor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 to Vice-Chancellor appointments
  • Scope of Chancellor's discretion under Section 12 of Maharashtra Universities Act 1994
  • Validity of Search Committee procedure
  • Writ of quo warranto against public appointment
  • Requirement of 10 years experience as Professor or equivalent under UGC Regulation 7.3.0(i)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (08) 90

Public Interest Litigation No.92 of 2010 along with PIL No.96 of 2010 and Writ Petition No.1901 of 2010

2011-08-09

Mohit S. Shah, C.J., Girish S. Godbole, J.

Ms. Rajani Iyer, Mr. Pankaj Kowli, Mr. Anil V. Anturkar, Mr. L.M. Acharya, Mr. S.M. Sakhardande, Mr. H.E. Dharmadhikari, Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Mr. Ravi Lokhande, Mr. R.A. Dada, Mr. Naushad Engineer, Mr. Rui Rodrigues

Vasant Ganu Patil, Nitin Deshpande, A.D. Sawant

Chancellor, University of Mumbai; State of Maharashtra; University of Mumbai; Registrar, University of Mumbai; Dr. A.S. Kolaskar; Prof. P. Balaram; Shri J.S. Sahariya; Dr. Rajan Welukar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation and Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai

Remedy Sought

A writ of quo warranto against Dr. Rajan Welukar and a direction to appoint the petitioner in WP No.1901 of 2010 to the post

Filing Reason

Alleged lack of essential qualification and ineligibility of Dr. Welukar under UGC Regulations, 2010, and irregularities in the selection process

Previous Decisions

Earlier PIL No.9 of 2010 challenged the constitution of a previous Search Committee; that committee was dissolved, and the present committee was constituted on 20 March 2010

Issues

Whether the UGC Regulations, 2010 prescribing qualifications for Vice-Chancellor were applicable to the selection process that began prior to their notification Whether the Search Committee's composition and procedure (recommending names without ranking) complied with Section 12 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Whether the Chancellor's exercise of discretion in selecting Dr. Welukar was arbitrary or contrary to law Whether a writ of quo warranto lies against a person appointed as Vice-Chancellor when the appointment is challenged on grounds of eligibility and procedure

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that Dr. Welukar lacked the minimum ten years of experience as a Professor in a University system or ten years of experience in an equivalent position as required by UGC Regulation 7.3.0(i) Petitioners argued that the Search Committee had a flawed composition, with only one member from outside the State Government, and that it failed to rank candidates in order of merit The petitioner in WP No.1901 of 2010 claimed he possessed superior qualifications and should have been appointed Respondents argued that the UGC Regulations were notified on 30 June 2010, after the selection process had commenced, and were not retrospective Respondents contended that the UGC Act does not empower the Commission to regulate appointment of Vice-Chancellors, as the subject of 'coordination and maintenance of standards in higher education' does not include such appointments Respondents asserted that Dr. Welukar's post as Director of SIMSREE is an equivalent position and that the Chancellor applied his mind properly

Judgment Excerpts

The Vice-Chancellor to be appointed should be a distinguished academician, with a minimum of ten years of experience as Professor in a University system or ten years of experience in an equivalent position in a reputed research and/or academic administrative organization. On the basis of the bio-data, academic qualification, experience & career profile and the individual interaction with the panelists, I find Dr. Rajan Welukar to be the most suitable person, amongst all the panelists, to be the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai. The University offers over 296 programmes through 672 affiliated colleges catering to over 6.5 lakh students every year.

Procedural History

On 28 September 2009, post of Vice-Chancellor fell vacant. Dr. Smt. Chandra Krishmurthy appointed as Acting Vice-Chancellor. On 20 July 2009, earlier Chancellor constituted a Search Committee headed by Dr. Andre Beitelle. In January 2010, PIL No.9 of 2010 challenged that committee. On 20 March 2010, the present Chancellor reconstituted the Search Committee. On 30 March 2010, the Chancellor briefed the committee. Advertisement published on 31 March 2010. 98 applications received, 20 shortlisted. Presentations made before Search Committee on 12 June 2010. Search Committee recommended five names in alphabetical order on 2 July 2010. Chancellor interacted with recommendees on 7 July 2010 and appointed Dr. Rajan Welukar. The instant petitions were filed thereafter.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994: Section 12
  • University Grants Commission Act, 1956: Regulation 7.3.0(i) of the 2010 Regulations
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Vice-Chancellor Appointment Under UGC Regulations and Maharashtra Universities Act. Challenge Focuses on Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 and Discretion of Chancellor in Selecting Vice-Chancellor.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Whether Small Cause Court is Subordinate to High Court on Original Side Under Section 41(b) of Specific Relief Act. Reference Arises from Appeals Against Rejection of Injunctions to Restrain Proceedings Under Mah...